Anonymous ID: 74e481 Dec. 19, 2017, 12:14 p.m. No.126204   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6213

>>126119

Yesโ€ฆ.but the information runs mostly parallel. I think her biggest complaint is that Q's events can be too specific and then they don't happen when stated. She is a stickler stating that dates of future events are speculative due to changing environments and circumstances. I'm not doubting Q's intentions, but sometimes events don't happen as predicted due to shifting timelines, and that seems to be a huge complaint of MA. She goes out of her way to not state dates because of that and is critical of Q for that, but the information is mostly parallel.

Anonymous ID: 74e481 Dec. 19, 2017, 12:24 p.m. No.126261   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Has Q's reference to Speed been decoded?

 

I certainly hope Amtrak train wasn't the prediction (reference). It would imply previous knowledge and the inability to stop it.