>>130778
>It feels like all of my work here has been for nothing
if your work was of value it was
why do YOU need recognition for YOUR contribution to a group effort?
>mfw newfaggots just don't understand what it is to be anon
>>130824
> suffer from extreme anxiety
that much is apparent, I hope you have fewer problems in the future.
As one anon to another, I think you've contributed.
Some has been positive
Some wasn't.
I feel I'm capable of determining wheat from chaff, and where I'm no certain I investigate. That means I double check most things, including that blurry image of a printout heading. Being a little bit familiar with image compression artifacts etc… I am not 100% convinced as to exactly what it says.
Having you harp and shill on behalf of your viewpoint and tell me what to look at and what NOT to look at without any definitive proof was irritating to say the least.
I'll have my opinion and I can back it up with facts, where there are no verifiable facts I understand it's opinion and I'm as open to change as I can be.
I'd suggest you learn to get satisfaction from the contribution itself and not the recognition.
We are ALL in for interesting times so try to be a little more flexible in your thinking and less authoritative in your outbursts.
Good luck.
dubito ergo cogito ergo sum
>We are the storm.
I think it's a wonderful illustration of the task we face as this hivemind sifts through the harvest separating the wheat from the chaff.
my personal opinion is that the heading is Gannett, only because I'm aware that all the talking heads get their talking points from a central source
>tfw the spring in easter spending
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PStpvviPgxk
And it's much more likely that a known entity is the source rather than some unknown / as yet un-proven walnut sauce aficionado society