I think the confusion has arisen because Jesus is described as the lion of the tribe of Judah AND the lamb slain from the foundation of the world.
The Isaiah verse describes the resulting world after the victory of the lion/lamb. :)
Agreed. I too an not against a possible Mandella effect existing - I just have too much faith in God's all-powerful ability to protect His word, to worry about the Bible being messed with - aside from some obvious examples of nefarious translations and abhorrent paraphrases which have been created by men. I trust God to preserve at least one decent translation through the centuries and trust His Spirit to guide us in discerning truth from error.
Most of my redpilling of friends has been going surprisingly well (started long ago, so now they're saying - "huh - this is what you were talking about x years ago!"
One friend however, is in the highly educated (some would say highly indoctrinated) liberal, cultural marxist camp… they're thinking of going for a job at Red Cross in Geneva, Switzerland. I worry this person is in the 4-6% Q mentioned. They could not even concede if Trump really was behind helping 3000+ kids out of trafficking in SA that he may worth giving a chance to! They said - I'd ask him about all of the other children suffering in places the US has removed aid money from. They also kept warning me that we should all be careful that this Q-op was not some carefully constructed propaganda exercise to get buy-in for horrific policy.
They cited Trump having made a $110b arms deal with SA, I pointed them to the Brookings.edu article saying it was fake news -that it was only letters of interest/intent. They then looked up the WH doc and said see! I made them re-read it and pointed out it was a "vision" document, of "intent" - NOT a contract, as per the Brookings article. They basically got flustered and angry and after a looooong silence: "Impeach him already."
Please pray for them(the 4-6%) anons.
Really, they really need it.
This is why the EVIDENCE going public is SO NECESSARY. It needs to be UNDENIABLE.
Yes, we did cover that. They brought up Soros actually in their defence actually, saying "there's even a conspiracy put out by Trump supporters that the White Helmets were funded by George Soros, and how that was rubbish and did I even know who the White Helmets were and what good they were doing.
I could tell it was a pet topic of theirs, so I didn't go into GS funding Netflix and backing the creation of the propaganda doco which made so many people fall in love with the White Helmets. Nor what they are really involved in doing…
The more evidence comes to light the less of an uphill battle this redialing is going to be. (Pic)
*Red-pilling
(and pic!)