>>144002

Not exactly right. Read Revelation, starting around Chapter 17. It is believed by many Christians that the Catholic Church is referred to and the Pope (possibly this one) may be the false prophet.

Revelation also says there will be a NWO with 1 govt and 1 religion

The Book of Revelation was given by Jesus sent by His angel to John, so it will be as He says it will be

>>144098

Sorry, you are confused. Revelation was written in Greek, not Sumerian, so original text cannot be Sumerian. Revelation is in all Christian Bibles as written by John; it’s not the Appocrypha which is not accepted in Christian Bibles and is a Catholic invention

Revelation description of the “one world religion” to be imposed at end times speaks poorly and unflatteringly of that religion that is why most learned Christians & pastors believe it is referring to the Catholic Church—which has corrupted the Wird of God and Christianity

>>144143

This pope has already caused a lot of division among the priests and the flock because he is doing things that go against the Bible and Catholic doctrine so some Catholics are already wondering if this pope is the false prophet

>>144248

Filtered

>>144210

I was also baptized and raised Catholic and switched to non-denominational church when in high school.

>>144227

The Old Testament, perhaps, but the New Testament wasn’t written until ~70 AD and later, depending upon which book. Revelation was written around 95 AD. All New Testament was written in Greek

>>144234

I’ve been studying the Bible, learning under pastors for NT and OT, and Rabbis for OT, since 1973, am a born again Christian who was once a Catholic, and the NT was still written in Greek not Sumerian from about 75 AD & after depending on the book (Revelation in 95 AD). Stating facts is opposite of being like a CNN freak, fag

>>144389

That’s incorrect but feel free to believe what you choose