Anonymous ID: 28c953 Dec. 22, 2017, 3:28 p.m. No.151575   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1602

>>151532

 

Vegas shooting. Seems the FBI contacted those who were there to send paperwork (non-disclosure) and recommended them joining a class action from attorneys they recommended which involves not being able to talk about it at all. I have to wonder if those witnesses who have been dying since the shooting are ones who won't sign and join their recommended class action.

 

Why is the FBI involved in setting up a class action suit..why are they recommending and handling the paperwork?

 

Sadly, J.P. lost his nephew-in-law in the Las Vegas mass shooting last month. His nephew was shot in the torso standing next to his wife. That left J.P.’s niece a widow with three children and no income. His niece spent a lot of time meeting with FBI agents — as a witness and a victim.

 

That’s what makes this story so shocking and outrageous. Is it possible that the FBI uses the trust and bond formed with victims of violent crime and even mass murder to sign them up as clients for private law firms?

 

Here’s the story.

 

J.P.’s niece was contacted by a FBI “victim specialist” a week after the Vegas tragedy — at the worst and most fragile moment of her life. The “victim specialist” identified herself as an employee of the FBI and said her goal was to help victims such as J.P.’s niece receive the money “she needs and deserves.” She asked this grieving widow to sign a form and send it back to get the process started quickly.

 

The form was a contract to join a class-action lawsuit against MGM and Mandalay Bay. Worst of all, it was a contract with two private law firms. I’ve seen the contract the FBI sent to this widow.

 

J.P. Hyan called the Los Angeles FBI office about this. The FBI “agent on duty” said he saw nothing wrong with such activity. He strongly suggested J.P. have his niece speak only to the FBI “victim specialist.”

 

When I contacted the FBI, I was referred to the agency’s national press office, which issued a statement: “The FBI Victim Services Division provides crisis intervention services to victims and families as well as information and referrals for a range of assistance to help them cope with the impact of a mass casualty event.”

 

It goes on to say, “Families who have lost a loved one to violent and sudden death often need referrals to public and private legal services to assist with life insurance, guardianship, wills and probate issues, and estate and tax planning. The referrals … do not encompass information on class-action lawsuits initiated by private attorneys.”

 

Vegas is still a mystery and yet we know there are complete lies involved and SA involved. The FBI is the head agency making sure the victims sign non-disclosures?

Anonymous ID: 28c953 Dec. 22, 2017, 3:44 p.m. No.151682   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>151650

>All of this mounting evidence undermines the media talking points around Special Counsel position of Robert Mueller – from the position of even having a basis for originating an investigation into Trump/Russia collusion etc. etc. However, the SC office, Robert Mueller, has never stated that an investigation into Trump exists.

 

>The investigative “mandate” Mueller carries is to look at Russian interference within the election; and as we have continually pointed out, there is NO INVESTIGATION into Donald Trump.

 

>The Clinton Campaign paid Fusion GPS to contract Christopher Steele for opposition research on candidate Trump. It now appears even more likely that FBI Counterintelligence Agent Peter Strzok used the information from Steele to get FISA warrants against the Trump campaign.

 

>The results of those FISA warrants were wiretaps on Trump campaign people. Those ‘wiretaps’ were then unmasked by Ben Rhodes, Susan Rice and other senior people within the Obama administration.

 

>◾The Clinton Campaign was the predicate for the Steele Dossier.

 

>◾The Steele Dossier was the predicate for the FISA Warrants (Agent Strzok).

 

>◾The FISA Warrants were the predicate for wiretapping and surveillance.

 

>◾The wiretapping/surveillance was the predicate for the unmasking.

 

>◾The unmasking/surveillance was the predicate for Robert Mueller’s SC charges.

 

>While the IG is working on exposing the political bias within the FBI and DOJ (report due shortly), congress is working on a similar track in exposing how that political bias was turned into action and used against Clinton’s political opponent.

 

>All of the dominoes in the graphic below are likely to fall; however, if you look closely at the graphic you realize why the TOP-TIER of the Democrat apparatus are suddenly willing to throw Hillary Clinton under the bus. They are attempting to stop the dominoes at her.