Anonymous ID: d7ec8c Dec. 22, 2017, 6:51 p.m. No.152988   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2994

>>152924

>>>152902

>Subsidies are the only funds the company has? Complete front company and run wholly with the subsidies?

>

EM's companies are insolvent without copious government spending. It has generally been assumed that his poor product delivery on Tesla cars is due to incompetence… but if those automated factories are meant for something other than cars, it would explain why he has employees banging out cars by hand.

 

Which is not how you build cars these days.

 

https:// www.wsj.com/articles/behind-teslas-production-delays-parts-of-model-3-were-being-made-by-hand-1507321057

 

This is a manufacturing nightmare that would put any other company six feet under. Even a too big to fail. It's comedy gold to the son of a plant manager, like myself… but the Japanese would be committing sepuku if it were them in authority over that.

Anonymous ID: d7ec8c Dec. 22, 2017, 6:56 p.m. No.153017   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3026

>>152994

Possibly. Though it is hard to say. The assets and institutions will survive. Either the state will appropriate them or market actors will. That is why order is important to this stuff. Part of it, at least.

Anonymous ID: d7ec8c Dec. 22, 2017, 7:03 p.m. No.153062   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3078 >>3102

>>153042

Possible… but not entirely likely.

 

EM is pushing for e-cars and weird transportation projects that no one asked for… but fit well within UN Agenda 2030 and other fun stuff that consolidates us all into nice little pens of orwellian nightmare.

Anonymous ID: d7ec8c Dec. 22, 2017, 7:08 p.m. No.153105   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>153045

>>>153036

>Not exactly- he earned the nickname “songbird” for a reason.

>

He only violated every virtue in the Code of Conduct. Then spared no expense in shutting down any investigation into POWs still held in Vietnam. He still have brain cancer? Would be interesting to find out how that incurable variety went away if he truly had it.

Anonymous ID: d7ec8c Dec. 22, 2017, 7:14 p.m. No.153147   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3152

>>153102

>>>153062 (You)

>Didn't hussein toss him a gazillion dollars?

>

He did a lot of that. Solyndra being a legendary fail. I think Q is hinting at something more. Even the amount that he is getting, publicly, from the U.S. is a little skimpy for the kinds of ops he is turning, amd it's not exactly flushing out against his market performance.

 

Further, he is saying Musk, personally. I suspect Musk is supposed to be a front man as a venture capitalist - a champion of free enterprise. That is exactly how Space-X was debuted. Tesla in a similar manner.

Anonymous ID: d7ec8c Dec. 22, 2017, 7:22 p.m. No.153202   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>153148

>So what if musk is just the front man for SE all while the cia runs the black physics proving ground behind the scenes

>

Skeptical.

 

My experience in the military and with restricted access programs leads me to believe that the market is actually abreast of most defense tech, today. Most of the research is public and the only real privilege exploited is that the thing you read about on Science Daily that can only be made in batch processes of sample size orders… can and will be bought (or the equipment to do it and training for specialists to replicate it). Most of the work is on taking COTS and tweaking it to a mission or platform goal.

Anonymous ID: d7ec8c Dec. 22, 2017, 7:52 p.m. No.153399   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>153375

These are people who think food comes from the store. We are not expected to think rationally.

 

Also… I'm getting a vibe that Q is waiting for the thread to roll over before dropping. Seems I am not the only one.