Anonymous ID: 9dacc4 Dec. 23, 2017, 1:06 a.m. No.155330   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5355

>>155088

This is a good outline, if anons can clear up some points of concern/ignorance for me I would appreciate it. If no comment the I already understand . . . .

 

>The Cabal was attempting to take complete control.

 

>1. Control The media

 

>2. Control communications

 

>- Apple (who stepped down)

Don't know.

 

>- Alphabet (who stepped down)

 

>- SpaceX

>- At&t

>- Comcast

 

>3. Control space

 

>Hillary wins = leverage effective

 

>The CIA funded Facebook, Alphabet, Apple and SpaceX/tesla

>(Leverage)

 

>Our government killed the space program and diverted funds to SpaceX.

 

>SpaceX was to deliver iridium satellites giving the Cabal the final piece to complete their global spy network. As an added bonus, they would be able to control their own private missle[i] system.

 

>Uranium One allowed them to deliver nuclear material to NK via Iran.

 

>Cash payment was made to Iran for facilitating the transfer.

 

>End Game:

 

>The Elites control NK. They armed NK with nuclear materials and intended to deploy a private guidance system that would allow NK to strike anywhere in the world.

 

>NK is Fantasy Land. A satanic pedo playground. They are completely isolated and strategically located. The intent was to take over NK and secure their future as a nation and rule the world with the threat of nuclear war.

Take over? I thought it was already a puppet state/cabal controlled?

 

>In exchange for assistance, they made a deal with SA. Talal was financier of the black projects. In exchange, they sold out America. The intent was to allow both Europe and America to be transferred to Talal and the Muslims extremist.

 

>Hillary lost. Who resigned? Who didn't? Musk tweet was a jab at the Cabal. The "splash" was a sign That they weren't deploying the sats. Who didn't resign? Who flipped? At&t took a hard line on trump. What did they announce before the tax vote? Who flipped?

Don't know who resigned/who didn't. Don't understand how Musk is a good goy if he controls SpaceX, which is a cabal instrumentality (missed that day of class).

 

>Trump is playing chess. We are apart of the game. We are rooks. We traverse the entire board in a linear fashion, connecting it all together. We are the media. We control the narrative (even lurkers).

 

>Future proves past. We are given a cryptic leak. ANON's decipher giving validity. Less intelligent feel intelligent and spread the word. It's picked up by mainstream media giving it even more credibility. When time is right and the public is aware, arrests are made. This is best chance to keep peace.

 

>You are saving the world. All of you.

Anonymous ID: 9dacc4 Dec. 23, 2017, 1:10 a.m. No.155355   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>155330

A related question I have that might resolve some of my confusion is: Q said "message sent" and then that Musk's tweet was "message back." QRD on both would be great.

Anonymous ID: 9dacc4 Dec. 23, 2017, 1:17 a.m. No.155389   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5399 >>5403 >>5490 >>5522

>>155112

Although I agree with you, the problem that arises is what happens when the enemy doesn't play by your rules? Stoicism and turning the other cheek is noble but if the cumulative effect is the elimination of your religion, your culture, and your people, then what is the point?

Anonymous ID: 9dacc4 Dec. 23, 2017, 1:31 a.m. No.155444   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5457

>>155268

I have a blackpilled friend. I share this stuff with him. He doesn't doubt any of it, but neither does he care much. He's not familiar with the term "limited hangout," but in effect that's what he thinks this is. Basically a new cabal will supersede the old, and, even if not satanist pedophiles, they will be above the law and continue to unjustly enrich themselves - so why should he care? Unfortunately I don't really have an answer for him, but I'm personally excited enough about the anticipated schadenfreude at seeing these bastards' heads roll that I'll worry about the rest later.

Anonymous ID: 9dacc4 Dec. 23, 2017, 1:40 a.m. No.155468   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5471

>>155403

You're basically restating my question in new terms. I'm saying it seems like a cucking device. I'm asking to either explain why it's not, or, if it is, how to reconcile with Christian values.