Thank you.
>>159377
Q has already specified that POTUS is safe. Focus.
>Maybe a couple versions to pick from?
I would choose something that is designed to make the reader think about it from their own perspective. Normies have empathy. Use it.
>PERHAPSโฆ.HE COULD NOT IN GOOD CONSCIOUS SEE THE WORLD BURN.
"Perhaps his conscience wouldn't allow this to continue."
Good catch.
>โฆwon't be reportedโฆ
Yeah, perhaps because the news about to break is going to eclipse it forever.
^^ THIS
Looks like someone did. Given that it helps, may not be worth figuring out who that is.
Stupid if dumb.
> group or organisation rather than a single person?
If plural matters, it is a level of power or group at a level in the hierarchy.
>in McCabe's door in 8 minute
I highly doubt they're going to give us anything that we can decode that could fuck up a kinetic op.
>Break when?
Nobody knows - part of the op. The news has been sliding toward more and more exposed corruption. It appears to be progressing toward a more sigificant disclosure of bad guys being arrested/prosecuted. That news (IMO) would eclipse much of the stuff DJT tweeted about.
>Do you signal ahead of time you will be attacking?
If you have a very high degree of confidence the attack will be successful (and/or have high confidence back-up plans), eluding to the attack before-hand can scare the shit out of the opponent and weaken them significantly.
Ding
>So still โlisten and believeโ; and โbig news is coming because itโs said to be comingโ.
Free will fellow anonfag. Personally, I prefer to OBSERVE, THINK and CONTIBUTE when I can.
Hopefully Soros becomes Soreass.
Sun Tzu - Art of War. Read. Good book.
>It should be pretty obvious at this point that every politician needs to prove that they AREN'T part of the swamp, not the other way around.
NO. Due process. Eliminating that is a REALLY bad idea.
KeK
Awesome.
Or maybe he went to see if it was true.
Most of the US population would be asleep at that time - not watching.