That is why the damning and completely irrefutable evidence MUST be made public.
It's the only thing that will put cognitive dissonance/pet theories/Mockingbird counter-narratives to bed.
And as the TRUTH sinks in, we will comfort and calm those around us…
If the evidence is irrefutable and the crimes indefensible then it won't matter who releases them.
Sadly, I agree (>>161129) - for a full wake up (the kind which could put 99% in hospital if not calmed/explained by anons in their midst) it needs to reflect the darkest heart of the evil. The evidence needs to reveal crime which NO ONE can rationalise.
Otherwise (with evidence that should be enough, but won't break through the cognitive dissonance wall) it will be somehow "rationalised away by people who don't want their beliefs to be shattered (or to believe Trump is capable of doing ANYthing good)
i.e.:
"weak" evidence: clear indication of treason/arming enemies, etc
liberal defence: but muh foreign policy you don't understand - complex nuanced diplomacy, etc (or but what about Trump muh Russian collusion, etc)
-"weak" evidence: video of trafficking children -
liberal defence: oh no, they were moving them, while in process of "rescuing" the kids
-"weak" evidence: video of satanic ritual (without sacrifice)
well, they should be allowed to practice their faith - religious freedom, etc.
Yup, it needs to be the really, universally DAMNING evidence that no-one wants to see/hear/read (suitably censored to protect the innocent) - but which they must, in order to understand how Trump is /their guy/ - if they have a heart for other humans at all.
It's happening in baby steps -
hetero sex scandals (Weinstein, et al)
gay sex scandals (Spacey, et al)
underage sex scandals (Open Secret, Polanski revisited, et al)
next steps…
pedo scandals
satanic ritual scandals
child trafficking scandal as pipeline for power structure built on depravity, blackmail and evil…
(Or something like that.)