Anonymous ID: a8e213 Dec. 23, 2017, 5:15 p.m. No.160828   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>160813

>So are we not waiting for something tonight?

>

We are… but at the same time, I think most of us know it wasn't likely a reference to tonight. At least, I don't really think it was. Won't stop me from looking, just in case. You never know what you will find when you look.

Anonymous ID: a8e213 Dec. 23, 2017, 5:18 p.m. No.160858   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>160835

Is there a white paper that explains how this is done, somewhere? I am not a networking guru by any standard, but this doesn't really mesh with how I understand it all to work. It sounds like folklore, to me.

Anonymous ID: a8e213 Dec. 23, 2017, 5:52 p.m. No.161119   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1159

>>161000

Perhaps Elon should spend less time fibbing to investors about being cleared for hyper tunnel ventures through governments he never talked to… and more time making sure his production supervisors over at Tesla have what they need to use the -automated- equipment to make the cars?

 

Just a thought.

Anonymous ID: a8e213 Dec. 23, 2017, 6:04 p.m. No.161223   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>161159

True, but we seem to have a Musk fan in our midst. I was building electric cars in highschool. I've always been a little… skeptical… of Tesla. I also have an upbringing in manufacturing, and love the comedy gold that unfolds when people who should never be trusted to dig a fucking hole get put in charge of a factory.

 

Just because they can do basic arithmetic and polish a turd on an overhead transparency doesn't mean they know how a business works. Much less a factory.

Anonymous ID: a8e213 Dec. 23, 2017, 6:16 p.m. No.161312   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1367

>>161236

The pertinent part of that anon's response was "doesn't make enough cars."

 

You going to fix that any time soon, or am I buying another Corolla? You have all that automation at your disposal up there, and you're short by like 80% of your projected volume for the past 6 months. That's usually bankruptcy territory for companies.

Anonymous ID: a8e213 Dec. 23, 2017, 6:26 p.m. No.161391   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>161314

That article is from 2003.

 

Not saying it is irrelevant, since Q may be referring to a past event… but… keep in mind what we are working with.

Anonymous ID: a8e213 Dec. 23, 2017, 6:29 p.m. No.161420   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>161379

Hmm…

 

Classic specops tactic is to create a hysteria event near a target for direct action as cover for the direct action.

 

Not jumping to conclusions, but I would rate this as one of the most probable of the proposed theories involving an op tonight.

Anonymous ID: a8e213 Dec. 23, 2017, 6:34 p.m. No.161461   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>161417

Missouri had an AG who caught a case of the suicides couple years ago along with his aide. He had a very successful streak, as he put together strike teams that would raid places under subpoena and shoot anyone who moved toward a shredder.

 

That could be part of "enough is enough." Teams reported back that there was movement and they were cleared to engage.