>>168121

>>168141

>>168117

This has never been confirmed. And I do not believe that is the meaning. It was used once as the stringer: "p_pers: WRWY" in which a separate Q post said "p_pers: public (not private)" so the acronym appears to refer to a classification status and not "We R With You"

>>168192

Proof shown

>>168212

How do you know it's a missing letter? P_pers has been used in other language work to indicate "personal pronoun"

>>168203

Right, which is why I am against people settling for "We R With You" and moving on to the next crumb. We should all keep questioning and seeking other possibilities.