>>170160

Tree with extra rings (link plz) proves billions of years.

But red blood in dinosaur fossils, meh who cares.

SMH

>>170213

>(You)

I didn’t get billions - I assumed you were implying evolution is correct.

Not the case?

>>170213

SMH - I googled. Tree age determined by carbon dating of rotten material around it. Not by rings.

>>170451

Now anon, let’s move on to discussing those red blood cells and organic matter in dinosaur bones that were supposed to be nothing but mineral deposits .

Middle of the night and twitter suspends @altassange as he claims to be JA and says WL is going to do a huge drop. And only has 120 or so followers when I followed.

>>170518

Good job anon, I felt like a fucking idiot because I didn’t and then it was suspended next time i checked

>>170522

I think that clip could be out of context, and he’s just saying they pulled the operation, as in the firefighters got out “just in the nick of time” before it collapsed.

Obvi still BS, but I didn’t think he literally meant “blow it up”

…. nothing to see here …