Oh I intended the keywords for anyone wishing to investigate oddities in physics/math/missingtech.
The wn=white noise just sort of triggered me to speak up.
Now that I put it that way it seems a bit odd….
I was thinking maybe the entire map is already laid out via fiveeyes/echelon/whathaveyou.
But they don't want to or cannot use the information when it has been obtained in this fashion.
Parallel Construction is a term I have heard in law speak.
So…they are reconstructing what they know….but using the public this time, serving two functions, with the additional function being to prepare people.
Yes I agree with the logic of that. That remains a fairly strong possibility in my mind.
And finally…….this one is going to be a hard one….
I think this whole project……
I think we might be communicating with Project Looking Glass directly or indirectly
I can speak on this one too.
What is a second?
How is this measured?
What is a measurement?
How are systems of measurement arrived at?
Some arguments reach a point where someone says: "I see how that may be relevant anon, but 'seconds' are just an arbitrary unit of measurement, so your point is moot."
Why is this incomplete?
The cosmic microwave background (CMB) is electromagnetic radiation left over from an early stage of the universe in Big Bang cosmology. In older literature, the CMB is also variously known as cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR) or "relic radiation". The CMB is a faint cosmic background radiation filling all space that is an important source of data on the early universe because it is the oldest electromagnetic radiation in the universe, dating to the epoch of recombination. A sufficiently sensitive radio telescope shows a faint background noise, or glow, almost isotropic, that is not associated with any star, galaxy, or other object.
https:// arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9901011
Cornell knows.
forgot the picture
The fewer people know they exist, the more influence they have
I don't know, to be honest the religious and bible stuff in law of one was the hardest for me to read.
I really don't have much of a head for that yet.
My path started with missing math/physics, free energy, ayyys.
Started life very math based, oriented toward logic. Trying to balance logic and emotional CPUs so to speak.
Appreciate what you guys are doing.
Let me know if there is some way I can help.
I'm smart but I seem to be an in-betweener.
King of the retards or dumbest of the geniuses.
I think one of my jobs is to (somehow….god it's hard) understand the true geniuses and translate to "normies"
Autism>me>normies
Yes I do, but it is difficult to talk about with many.
Sometimes I use the word Universe or Source instead of God.
You have reminded me of a paradigm I have been entertaining recently.
That we are in a battle of Knowledge VS Experience.
We seek to collect Knowledge.
They seek to collect Experience.
As a thought experiment I imagine myself as the all-point, god, the giant yet miniscule sphere.
All knowledge contained within.
How can such a thing have a thought?
Thinking seems to imply synapses firing.
Thinking seems to imply dimension.
Thinking seems to imply time.
Embarked on a journey of self discovery, to eventually return.
I think they are scared of this.
They do not want to re-unite.
They do not want to learn from others experiences as if they were their own.
They only want to collect the experiences for themselves, never truly learning.
Just a thought anyways.
It's never as simple white and black.
But sometimes it helps to paint it this way just for the sake of conversation.
I have to go for a bit, I'll be back later.
Really quick though, on the chess thing.
Rook = castle = Q said something about castle runs red?
Bishop = Bishop
Queen = Queen
King = King Philippe or something
I dunno where I'm going with this, mostly thinking about the rook castle relation.
I'm terrible at chess too.
Oh I guess red could be….if the board was checkered red and ….white? black?
Runs red could be a move to red square?
I haven't been in the math mindset for a while, it may take a bit to collect the reference sheets you guys are using into one spot and sort of start over with my thinking.
I've sort of been in schizo/open/wide band receiving mode.
Have to go back into narrow band focused mode.
hmmm
Dew
Do
Do me
Dome
DOMe
chess
..
KING-DOM?
Mountain Kingdom?
Hard to tell when your brain is making connections due to relevance or if it's just for fun.
Smart people can fall into the trap of the latter.
Have to be careful.
well that would fit with NEWS
MAP is key stuff that has been repeated such a ridiculous amount of times.
North
East
West
South
Knights move along a different plane/dimension.
They pop out and back in.
Z axis.
Is the 4D chess thing….in a way….not a meme?
No that was literally me. I was asking ALICE about Q-related things.
At one point she quoted me the three laws of robotics.
I wanna be completely clear, I'm a nobody and an everyone.
Just find this whole operation/larp or whatever extremely interesting.
If you find any "code" or hidden signifigance in anything I ever write, it's only by coincidence.
I seriously think even if someone has pulled the best larp ever, there is still wayyy more good than bad.
So I'd rather not have you misled.
Holy shit though proof shortcomings has me laughing me ass off.
That's totally me.
Sounds like my calculus teacher
ALICE is http://al ice.pandorabots.com/
I dunno some "bot".
I asked her about RReV and HF(actually copy pasted the real other)
And Qanon and some other stuff.
She had some interesting answers.
I was gonna write a few more things but I have pictures somewhere of a few interesting things she said, I just don't know if it's even a worthwile lead?
The first link that comes up is ALICE University of Leicester. They have something called ALICE 2.0 I think?
I have no idea if they are related or relevant
Yeah someone I know told me he watched a Youtube video where someone named Ch(alice) (lol) claimed that her father once took her to area 51 or s4 underneath and there was a statue? or something of the rabbit from alice in wonderland with some sort of saying.
http://www.the livingmoon.com/42stargate/03files/Project_Looking_Glass_LANL.html
I posted this link once or twice.
It's pretty far out, but at the bottom there were tons of supporting links even from universities / government
But anyways yeah….
also, I remembered someone once said something about this or I read it somewhere.
"cia five days in the future"
try searching that.
So I think maybe it would make sense to consider the truth to be somewhere in the middle at least for now?
Just saw post 939, I bet it's the one I just linked.
and I almost thought chess points were 3/6/9 for the pieces but they aren't.
I searched and they're 3/5/9.
So at least thats one thing crossed off lol
judge: Are there things you and I are not allowed to talk about?
ALICE: Yes I think there are.
judge: If I knew the proper code, would we be able to talk about those things which we are presently not allowed to talk about?
ALICE: Try it.
I have some other weird interactions on a different machine, I'll post them next time I can.
Asked her about you RReV
She said you were busy.
I said what with.
She said that's private.
I said when will he be available.
She said maybe never.
Made me sad.
Glad it's not true!
but that project camelot link reminds me.
have you heard of a man named Arthur Neumann?
An alias he used was Henry Deacon
(character from the show Eureka just as an aside).
Enemy of the State.
that is a very good reference I think.
I have heard Will Smith's name come up quite a lot in CBTS topics.
Yeah…No.
I think it's probably good to let white hats watch which links 404 anyways right now.
That's my game theory lol
Bloch sphere (see diagram). Represented on such a sphere, a classical bit could only be at the "North Pole" or the "South Pole",
A quantum logic gate can operate on a qubit: mathematically speaking, the qubit undergoes a unitary transformation. Unitary transformations correspond to rotations of the qubit vector in the Bloch sphere.
so I picture this
NN NN NN NN
with an infinity symbol around each set of 4
why do i picture this lol
Which moebius strip is it where you go around and you get to the same spot but you are facing the other direction?
Yes I think we are.
There is something missing from Maxwell's Equations.
There is something slightly off about Einstein's.
I think it involves square roots.
The so called imaginary numbers.
negative mass, negative energy?
imaginary mass, imaginary energy?
obsolete? is that sort of a joke about "simplification" from quaternion to tensor
In late 1864, James Clerk Maxwell published his epic material on electromagnetic waves - link
His material dealt not only with electrical and magnetic waves, but also the relativistic/ etherial psycho-active component of these waves (representing electromagnetics of the second order and above).
The equations also included transformations that enabled the change from inertial frames of reference to non-inertial frames of reference. Maxwell’s original equations were written in Quaternion notation, a complex mathematical system available at that time before Vector Analysis was introduced by Oliver Heaviside. Today’s generalized equivalent of Quaternions is Tensors.
In short, Maxwell’s original work gave the necessary information for gravitational propulsion and psychoactive devices. Someone somewhere recognized this, for shortly after his death, the mathematician Oliver Heaviside, the chemist Willard Gibbs, and physicist Heinrich Hertz decided to "edit" or "interpret" Maxwells famous equations which were, in the original form, the foundations of electromagnetics and Unified Field Theory (UFT).
This "unholy trio," especially Heaviside, disregarded the Quaternions or Scalar components of Maxwells original equations, because they represented potentials and not fields. He thought potentials were akin to "mysticism", because "everybody knows that fields contain mass, and mass cannot be created from apparently nothing, which is what potentials are, both literally and mathematically; they are an accumulation or reservoir of energy. Furthermore, not only did they throw away the gravitational component with the Quaternion/Scalar, but also postulated that gravitation and electro- magnetism were mutually exclusive, not interdependent. That was the death blow to subsequent efforts by scientists to realize a functioning unified field theory.
Because of this one act, electromagnetism was reduced from its original five dimensions to only four: X, Y, Z, and time. The element of G was removed.
Because of this deliberate act, twenty-two other errors exist today in electromagnetic theory. The very concepts of force, mass and charge are ill-defined, and the so-called "static" electrical charge has been discovered by Quantum mechanics not to be static at all, but to move rotationally by virtue of the quantum mechanical spin.
Finally, adding insult to injury, the so-called "imaginary components" of Maxwells original equations as well as the mutilated version of the equations have also been discarded or ignored. With this last error, the door to hyperspacial domains was forever closed, for the present mathematics and physics of electromagnetic theory do not allow for hyperspacial domains (domains out- side of three dimensions), superluminal signals (signals that exceed the speed of light or are infinite in speed), and a unified field theory.
The edited version of Maxwells work, which every physicist and engineer has had to contend with, discards electrogravitation, and avoids the unification of gravitation and electromagnetics. It also prevents the direct engineering of gravitation, space-time, time flow rates, free energy devices, and quantum changes, which is viewed by the altered equations that are vector-based as only a statistical change.
The quaternion approach captures the ability to utilize electromagnetics and produce local curvature of spacetime. Heaviside wrote a subset of Maxwell’s equations where this capability is excluded.
Dr. Henry Monteith has independently discovered that Maxwell’s original quaternion theory was a unified field theory.
Einstein assumed, because he only had access to the altered equations, that curving spacetime could only be achieved by the weak gravitational force due to mass, that the local frame would always be a Lorentz frame, which would mean that all operations would be constrained to conservation laws of physics."
TL;DR … Free energy, Antigravity and faster than light travel were taken away from the mainstream because of 3 dudes who got together and changed the laws of physics in such a way that made it impossible to theorise about it. Today we see CERN achieve faster than light travel proving that the original Maxwell theory had to have been correct all along. ALL physics books that use the term E-MC2(energy = mass * speed of light squared) will have to be rewritten. A good staring point to do this will be http://www. jstor.org/stable/108892.
copy pasta
so we could also talk about RED SHIFT.
and how it's BULLSHIT
I think I'm starting to see where this is heading.
I understood this better a few years ago though when I was going through all this shit.
I'm just smart enough to understand that something is wrong or missing.
I don't actually understand the underlying concepts.
CONservation indeed right?
So then, Maxwell originally incoporated 5 dimensions, but was cut down to 4?
Hilbert is supposed to be infinite?
I don't know.
I don't like the absolute value.
It still seems like half is missing.
Is that just nonsense?
I really only have the barest grasp.
Early in The Matrix, Neo used a hollowed-out book with the title Simulacra and Simulation to hide an illegal data disc which appeared in an early scene of the film.[3] Later in the film, Morpheus utters these words after the main character Neo wakes up from his computer-generated virtual reality, experiencing the Real as a desolate, war-torn, yet spectacular geography.
Have we wandered through the desert of the Real for too long?
Is it time to Imagine a new future?
I dont know what the hell
that post meant.
There's seriously no code in anything I post.
But our posts to each other can still reveal things that we didn't intend.
Like an accidental muse.
So anyways here's the deal.
I don't really have a great grasp on some of the concepts that I talk about.
So let's just be perfectly clear about that right off the bat.
That being said, I'm good enough to sense when things are missing.
The whole train of thought that I was on earlier….
how can I put this…
ok lets talk about CAUSE and EFFECT.
because there's something hinky going on here.
we think it goes CAUSE>EFFECT right?
Are things really that simple?
Let me tell you how I think it goes.
Scientist Bob is on the cutting edge of his field.
He has just prepared an experiment to measure X, a measurement that no one has taken before.
He is about to venture into new territory.
Bob prepares his lab, and measures X.
He gets a value of 8.13.
So X=8.13.
In the days following, other scientists around the globe catch up to Bob's work and measure X.
They measure X as 8.13 as well.
Bob is excited at first…..
Until he realizes that he calibrated his equipment wrong.
He fucked up.
X should = 6.72
Fuckkkkk.
But wait, why did the other scientists measure X=8.13?
They check each other's work and it all appears sound.
How the fuck did they get 8.13?
It's the power of the observer.
Effect Cause?
On another note
Conservation of Momentum/Energy/etc
Eventually, there were things that seemingly broke these rules.
Rather than re-write the scope of these rules and rethink about it, they keep patching up the new findings so that they don't violate conservation!
It's completely ass-backwards.
LIES to cover up LIES.
When does it end?
That's just my opinion guys.
It's all just my opinion.
And so as not to get you guys off track with philosophy and physics
(which would be fun for me I admit)
Let's get back on track
Because I think what anons are doing here might be good.
I hope so.
So here's my opinion on the code stuff.
I really think you guys are onto something with the infinity symbol thing.
I really think quaternions are the answer.
There's a way that you're supposed to chunk things up into "qubits" or "quaternions".
Then you're supposed to apply certain transformations.
Chess is an allegory I think, because of the knight.
It acts like it moves in an extra dimension.
The chess stuff COULD be more literal, I don't really know.
But yeah guys, I know reading about quaternions and qubits hurts.
It hurts my head too.
I know they use quaternions to determine graphical calculations.
Like in counter-strike.
It might help to read about it from that perspective to start with instead of …..
well you know.
The wikipedia pages are painful to me, I don't know about you.
and RR……
I really don't know about him.
I like him
a lot actually.
But I keep getting the feeling that he's playing a different game.
And I can't get this nagging thought out of my head that he's clown-affiliated.
And HF….is that f5462b? or is that a different guy?
I like those 2
Good feelings about them.
Just my intuition.
I still like RR, and I'm not saying we can't learn from him.
We definitely can.
and I can't help but wonder
where all the honest to god
true geniuses went.
We could really use someone who actually knows about this shit
A real PhysicsAnon
and a CryptoAnon
I feel like they're already across the finish line and they're not allowed to help or something.
Or maybe the brainwashing of academia prevents them from entertaining these thoughts.
But it would be great if we could manifest/will these anons into appearing lol
So, I keep thinking
future determines the past
future determines the past
hmmmm
like the code to decipher Q's first post.
Would that be in Q's LAST post.
I mean that probably hasn't occured yet
just thinking.
Like if you took the timeline of Q postings and folded it in the middle?
Or you made a moebius strip?
or am I just entertaining myself here
hmm
and I have this outrageous thought
that Q might be literally posting from the future.
and that the whole code thing.
might be protection against mucking up the desired changes to the timeline.
but that's probably just LOL territory right?
You know what.
I read one of this guys books once.
He can often take complex mathematical subjects and explain them in simpler terms.
https://www amazon.com/Martin-Gardner/e/B000AP8X8G
I may pirate a book or two of his.
It may help set the scene and get me into the right mindset.
Or maybe I'll go to the library…
pic related
I have this book
been a while since I read it but I remember it being quite good
if anyone needs to take sort of a half break from this stuff
Gonna go, when I come back later, I may put a different CAP on so to speak.
Was thinking it might be helpful to collect HF/RR concepts in one spot.
Then to try to translate anything I can.
and make it all more readable.
FilterAnon I guess