GS is a worm, which we all know. Speculation on "P":

Not NP, because she is NP in Q posts

If the Pope, why not "the P?" Obscuring, or indicating not him?

Not the Podestas, because they are small players (at least now).

So, we need to look at GS himself. His role is to provide bodies (useful idiots) to populate the rallies and other bad guy gatherings.

Who would be interested in directing HR? Well, in a company, that's the CEO. Who is the CEO of the bad guys?

Not one person. So, who is the director of HR?

P

This is as far as my thought chain takes me right now. My initial guess: The Pope. Confidence level: Low (20%)

I keep coming back to the fact that GS was responsible for providing bodies/manpower. His organizations backed Antifa and similar useful idiots when crowds were needed.

Who is P, who would be telling GS where to provide manpower/crowds? That question needs to be answered for us to have any confidence in the identity of P.

All other ideas (Philippe of Belgium, Phillip of England/Windsors, Peterson, the Pope, Pindar [needs a name, not a title; Q has consistently used initials from names], Pelosi, Podesta A or B) need to show where this link is supplied.

Everything above is my opinion, but I think it makes sense. Who would call up manpower to a certain location/event/showing?

Manpower was NBPP brandishing shotguns at polling places. Manpower was Antifa and the Occupy folks. Manpower was the pink pussy hats. What is the common thread?

>>210223

If the Vatican owns all of humanity, then it makes sense that they would direct the disposition of human resources.

Confidence level that P is the Pope now 35%.

How does Pope determine where to tell GS to dispose the rent-a-crowds?

>>210382

"…takes orders from P"

It does not say that P directs GS…. but that the orders come to GS from P. If the Podestas are the communications conduit, then they/he would deliver orders to GS.

As much as the Pope fits, I don't see how he is concerned with Occupy Wall Street. Then again, GS probably had general orders and was allowed to do what he felt was correct 95% of the time, with few instances of direct instructions for specific targets/actions.

Sorry for the "thinking out loud" vein.

Is P Peter Munk?

Saw photo of him with arm around GS on this board.

Interview of him with lots of his own words:

https:/ /www.economist.com/blogs/schumpeter/2014/04/interview-peter-munk

>>210981

https: //www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/international-business/european-business/mining-magnate-peter-munk-selling-superyacht-marina-in-montenegro/article29817069/

http:// www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2099254/Victory-Daily-Mail-Banker-Nathaniel-Rothschild-loses-libel-action-Lord-Mandelson-meeting-report.html

Note the photo in the above (attached)

http: //www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/montenegro/8627610/Montenegro-hosts-billionaire-Nat-Rothschilds-birthday-bash.html

>>210984

Everything you said is true; however, it does not mean that the Pope is P. Peter Munk is also Hungarian, connected, and if nothing else looks more like a lizard than GS. He is also in Canada, and well-connected. Amazing that he was perfectly positioned to take advantage of the collapse of SA and Rhodesia.

There are no coincidences, right?

>>218685

>…Mark of the Beast. You can see how fond they're of the number 666 too.

666 in Roman numerals is DCLXVI. 666 is not unlike saying, "The number of the Beast is 654321." I don't think the triple 6's have any real meaning outside the Omen movies.