Decoding False Prophet Pope Francis - DJT recently tweeted Thursday regarding Trillions of dollars that were noted to be expected by the US to pay. (note: the tweet w/ COLDEST and TRILLIONS "bundle up" are a coded dual meaning(s) here but it is a lead in to this discussion re: the false prophet Pope Francis).

Trump wrote on Twitter Thursday, "In the East, it could be the COLDEST New Year's Eve on record." He added: "Perhaps we could use a little bit of that good old Global Warming that our Country, but not other countries, was going to pay TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS to protect against. Bundle up!"

Now that an illicit election (collusion from St Gallen's Group of Cardinals forbidden by Good Saint Pope John Paul II's Universi Dominici Gregis = instant excommunication) and possibly further collusion within (illicit group) resulted in the NWO Globalist False Prophet election of Pope Francis.

See:

>>56405

>>56420

https://8ch.net/cbts/res/1346.html#56405

https://8ch.net/cbts/res/1346.html#56420

Now Pope Franics, under the direction of PPP (? power of The black pope Adolfo Nicolas The Superior General of the Jesuits (TANTSGJ)?) and from higher up in the TOP in the Pyramid? (91)

False Prophet Pope Francis is using the power of the Seat of Peter (Rome) to influence billions of faithful - but unknowing to the schemes of /_\ top - to embrace a false NWO goal of Climate Change - Evil taxation.

(Note: Prior 202791 decoding: Black Pope: TANTSGJ, (cult), holds more real power THEN Pope Francis.)

False Prophet Pope Francis (puppet) is using "Climate Change" has one of the greatest power wielding leverage on "social justice/social environmentalism" that is dangerously capable of leading to humanism.

Humanism (Secular Humanism) is a heresy. Simple explanation:

Secular humanism basically means "nice atheist", so draw your own conclusion… clearly "secular humanism" is BAD from the Christian perspective. Secular humanism says that there is no God-given divine moral code and that morality is basically whatever humans decide that is.

(sound familiar? changing moral code to "what you decide it to be":: Amoris Laetitia?)

What could possibly happen in pushing Climate Change (re: Paris Treaty)? TRILLIONS of dollars being given to "entities" to try to stop a scientific folly. Where and to who would the money go to? What would they do with it?

Money going to third world countries - who would tell them what to do? Control. Corruption. NWO. Evil Plans. Interfere with Sovereign Nations. Transfer great wealth out of rich nations. Sounds like a Bilderberg NWO scheme to me.

———-

http://mashable .com/2015/01/15/pope-francis-global-warming/?utm_campaign=Feed:%20Mashable%20(Mashable)

>Pope Francis says global warming is 'mostly manmade'

>Mashable ^ | 1/15/15 | Andrew Freedman

>As the United States Senate prepares to vote on a non-binding resolution on whether or not manmade global warming exists, Pope Francis weighed in on the issue with his most extensive and forceful comments on the subject to date.

>

>Let's just say that the pope is not aligned with many Senate Republicans, who doubt the reality and threat of manmade global warming, on this issue.

>Speaking to reporters aboard his plane while flying to Manila from Sri Lanka, Pope Francis said the "majority" of global warming is manmade, which is a view that is consistent with mainstream climate-science findings.

>“I don’t know if it is all [man’s fault] but the majority is, for the most part, it is man who continuously slaps down nature,” he said, according to The Guardian.

>His outspoken stance on climate change has encouraged debate within the Catholic community worldwide, as many people view the Earth as God's creation, and think it is arrogant to believe that humans could ever play such a dominant role over nature. Senate Environment and Public Works Committee >chairman Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.), an evangelical Christian, is one of the most prominent holders of this view.

>“We have, in a sense, lorded it over nature, over Sister Earth, over Mother Earth,” the pope said, according to The Guardian.

>“I think man has gone too far,” he added. “Thank God that today there are voices that are speaking out about this.”

>The pope plans to issue an encyclical in June that will lay out his views on climate change and other environmental issues in greater detail, ahead of a crucial global warming summit in Paris scheduled for this December. An encyclical is an official Papal document that is sent to all Catholic bishops around >the world.

———- 1/2

>>225296

———— Response From a "Scientist" - "Evil Taxation Plans and Errors of Global Climate Change"

>The Vatican's Secretary of State was one of the leaders representing 150 nations in the Nov. 30-Dec. 11 2015 discussions in the COP-21 summit on Climate Change in Paris. After reaching an "adoption of an agreement" on the Paris climate talks, there was an immediate urging for the international >community to promptly put it into action (Sunday Angeles address Pope Francis) (http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/pope-francis-urges-action-after-paris-climate-agreement-reached-78971/)

>Saint Pope John Paul II - "Truth cannot Contradict the Truth"

>It is the responsibility of the Vatican's Pontifical Academy of Sciences to advise the Pontiff in matters of scientific research, including any relevant information that may be "unsettled". Pope John Paul II delivered a profound statement "Truth cannot Contradict the Truth" in delivering a message to the >Pontifical Academy of Sciences 22 October 1996 regarding the scientific theory of Evolution & Creation. This profound statement inferred to the heart of known contradictions of the completeness of scientists theories on Evolution, in addition to reconciliation with the truths of revelation on Creation. (http://www.ewtn .com/library/PAPALDOC/JP961022.HTM)

>Scandals, contradictions, non-concensus, data model shortcomings

>Even greater contradictions, non-concensus, and data model shortcomings - in true scientific knowledge - are replete in the theory of "Climate Change". Yet, there indicates a "rush", supported by the Vatican, to declare this "man developed theory" in where it necessitates implementing a serious burden upon nations, states, and individuals to solve a perceived manmade or man-participating "threat" to an "emerging planetary crisis"***. Pope John Paul II would again echo the profound statement "Truth cannot Contradict the Truth".

>Indeed, there is great controversy and scandal that has been revealed regarding global temperature databases. (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/environment/globalwarming/11395516/The-fiddling-with-temperature-data-is-the-biggest-science-scandal-ever.html)

———– 2/3

>>225296

Surprise!! who has their hands in the cookie jar? Corruption at the UN from the World Meteorological Organization.

The World Meteorological Organization is a direct entity under the United Nations. The UN has been a tool for pushing humanism in False Prophet Pope Francis' agenda.

The stealing of $3.5 million dollars was used to buy votes to secure the election of Michel Jarraud.

WMO has also been involved in scandal:

————–

Last week, details began emerge of a new scandal. This one involves the World Meteorological Organization, a U.N.-controlled agency. According to The New York Times, one of the organization’s senior officials embezzled more than $3 million over three years. The Times further reports that the organization, with a staff of 350 and an annual budget of about $75 million, was “rife with intrigue” and suffering from mismanagement and favoritism. For example, the accountant who uncovered the embezzlement reports being told early in his tenure, “‘People here get promoted not because of their work, but because they’re nice to the powerful people here.”

————-

WMO SCANDAL:

http://dailysignal .com/2009/09/21/american-taxpayers-get-hit-twice-at-the-world-meteorological-organization/

>American Taxpayers get hit twice at the World Meteorological Organization

>Brett Schaefer / September 21, 2009 /

>As if we needed another example of why the U.N. and its affiliated organizations have earned a reputation for poor accountability, opacity, and mismanagement, along comes a scandal from the World Meteorological Organization (WMO). The WMO is a U.N. specialized agency based in Geneva. The U.S. is a member of the WMO and gave the organization $1.9 million in 2008 and 2009. The FY 2010 budget request for the WMO is $2.2 million.

>A couple of years ago, WMO internal auditor Maria do Rosario Veiga was fired after refusing to discontinue investigations an embezzlement scheme where WMO officials stole $3.5 million and used the money to buy votes to secure the election of Michel Jarraud to be Secretary General of the organization. Despite demands from U.S. Congressmen, no investigation into her dismissal was conducted.

>She appealed to the International Labor Office Administrative Tribunal which reviewed her case and found that she was wrongly dismissed. FOX News has the conclusion to the story, “Nearly four years after her dismissal, Veiga, a Portuguese national, has been awarded what is believed to be one of the largest amounts ever paid by the International Labor Office Administrative Tribunal. The ILOAT awarded Veiga $476,098 for defamation, harassment and wrongful termination while carrying out her recognized audit duties.”

>As one of the largest contributors to the WMO, the U.S. is a double loser here. The stolen money doubtlessly involved U.S. contributions and, as a financier of the WMO, we will have to pay a share of Veiga’s award. But the worst part is that Jarraud was appointed to a second four year term in 2008. Who says crime doesn’t pay?

—————- 3/3