I see you @LizCrokin! Spread those memes!

>>204780

We were never directed by Q to follow a white rabbit. @kill_rogue changed his user name after the kill_rogue drop. You were doing so well, too. If you are going to redpill people who hate Trump, you need to have your facts straight.

>>204824

Lying shill. The name was changed after the drop.

>>204829

IDGAF if you follow/go to it. Just don't falsely attribute it as a genuine Q account. Good anons have done great research as to the timeline of that account. It was changed after the drop.

>>204874

No. False.

>>204773

You're a complete idiot. The twitter account name was changed after the drop. You were not directed there by Q. An anon just took a golden opportunity. But again, I speak logically, so you won't be able to understand it. Go there all you want. In fact, follow it. I'm sure the followers collected will be useful to someone.

>>204891

Shill sign: shifts the goal posts when his argument is proven false. Now he says he wasn't saying Q directed us there or that it is Q twatter, but that he just wants us to go see it. Fine, go see it. Following it would be very foolish.

>>204938

1. Go to Twatter

2. Type this in search box "until:2017-11-20 to:@0seek0"

3. Get results. Should be this:

>>204890

Which Q post told you to look for a white rabbit? Hint: use qcodefag, spreadsheet, pastebin of all posts. Search 'rabbit.' Do you get results?

>>205035

I has been assumed this was intentional and brings our attention to the letters "nk"

>>205060

If he'd misrepresent who he is,how trustworthy can he be? I'm certainly not following that account.

>>205067

Bull. Shit. You're not using your brain.

>>204603

Baker, please consider this for the batter so that anons are not mislead as to the origin of the @kill_rogue account.

>>205029

>>205109

I'm presenting you with facts, not interpretation. The user of the @kill_rogue twitter account had the user name @0seek0 as recently as 11/19 which can be seen with your own fucking eyeballs by doing the search on twitter as I showed you. Now, I don't care if you follow it, read it, believe it yourself. But if you spread disinformation by claiming that account is for a fact Q, I will call your lying, shill faggotry out.

>>205133

So instead of admitting you're wrong, you're going to cry to the baker. This is a place to present facts and battle disinfo. Head on back to fb where your feels are of anyone's concern.

1. Go to Twatter

2. Type this in search box "until:2017-11-20 to:@0seek0"

3. Put theory that Q controls @kill_rogue to rest.

>>205163

Yeah, they released some emails. You could say they are redact-ulous.