>>204710
no Wiki today
Emails released through State Dept
cool
its on the State .dov account, under FOIA
FOR RESEARCHERS - CATALOG of DOCUMENTS
https ://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/
Daily Caller v DOJ Comey Memos Cross MSJ 01830
Daily Caller v DOJ Comey Memos Cross MSJ 01830
December 20, 2017
NorCal Tea Party v IRS JW amicus 00341
NorCal Tea Party v IRS JW amicus 00341
December 18, 2017
JW v. IRS remove B5 redactions 01559
JW v. IRS remove B5 redactions 01559
December 18, 2017
JW v FBI Strzok complaint 02682
JW v FBI Strzok complaint 02682
December 14, 2017
JW v CA NVRA complaint 08948
JW v CA NVRA complaint 08948
December 13, 2017
JW v DOJ Comey Memos Cross MSJ 01189
JW v DOJ Comey Memos Cross MSJ 01189
December 13, 2017
JW v DOJ Non Opposition Withdraw 00421
JW v DOJ Non Opposition Withdraw 00421
December 12, 2017
how do YOU interpret Q's post, FAG!
Thanks for baking
I have noticed over the last few days:
When Anons genuinely offer an reasonable interpretation, certain other Anons scream..
BS
BAN HIM
etc
This is an intentional act to thin the crowd…
Smells much like a clown OP to me.
Just saying…keep a watch for it.
Bad actors disguised as "Authoritative Anons"
The other thing is that when relevant drops by Anons are made…they are being completely discounted by same crew of Authoritative Anons.
The loudest protesters are DISFINFO
Not acting in the best interest of the operation of the board.
Thanks
I have NO position.
I am here doing research.
I follow all leads
I don't pre-judge
How about YOU?
You assume too much…smug POS
look it the f-ck up
You are assuming too much
I never said it was Q
When the possibility was raised…
I considered it and did full analysis on the account.
I am STILL not convinced it is Q.
So get the Fck off my back
U R LAZY or ill-equipped to do your own search?