Anonymous ID: 33d864 Dec. 29, 2017, 4 p.m. No.205827   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5985 >>6314

Quick note for BO and all bread bakers.

• I’ve lurked daily since before Q used the first trip code, often for hours.

• Red-pilled even before Morpheus offered one to Neo.

• My profession is writing/presenting technical information for “normies.”

 

That established, I offer these to consider:

  1. The “8chan/cbts/” genie is out of the bottle. Beanz, Anti-School, Unirock, and MANY others have sourced this site. Their curious followers are those for whom this board ultimately does it’s work.

  2. The CBTS baking kitchen, IMO, needs a “front of the shop” to sell bread to drop-in customers.

  3. New visitors need clear guidance what to do once they get to CBTS. The current “dough starter” beginning each loaf is for cooks in the kitchen, not customers out front.

  4. Please consider inserting a very simple redirect just beneath the current loaf title: “Visitors from YouTube, Twitter, Facebook, Gab, etc., WHAT YOU SEEK IS HERE” Send them to a curated, simplified info and meme dump site w/o the ability to comment.

 

Perhaps, just perhaps, this will keep customers wanting baked bread out of the kitchen while it is being baked.

 

Grateful for your work, Anons.

Anonymous ID: 33d864 Dec. 29, 2017, 4:21 p.m. No.205946   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5949 >>5966 >>5983 >>6028

>>205829

PhD in Biblical Studies here; Religious Studies professor for 30+ years. Can read the Bible (OT/Deuterocanonicals/NT) in “original” Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek, and in Syriac, Latin, Spanish, French, German, and English translation. (Don’t be too impressed; I’m only trying to establish my credentials for the following comments.)

 

Hebrew Bible codes are bogus. Everything depends on using the same manuscript for all searches. Otherwise, a spelling difference of just one letter in one word, say in Genesis 2, out of over 630,000 words in the whole, screws up the results.

 

The same approach has been used on the first edition of Microsoft Programmers Manual and a particular printing of Shakespeare’s complete works in historical order with similarly “astounding” results.

 

Identical results were not replicable in later MS editions or with different offerings of Shakespeare’s works. However, even these other versions created “astounding” results.

 

Really, all one needs is a lot of words and a data mining program to sift them as the program says.

Anonymous ID: 33d864 Dec. 29, 2017, 4:33 p.m. No.206020   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>205966

Sorry, I took things off topic.

Short answer about variation: no standardized text until high Middle Ages. Many manuscripts predate that time. Dead Sea Scrolls. No single authority to “tolerate/not tolerate” variations.