>>WikiLeaks posted this just now
>Trump lawyers saying Wikileaks is immune as they are protected by the Communications Decency Act -
>Conspiracy with WikiLeaks. Plaintiffs next assert a conspiracy with WikiLeaks.
>To overcome WikiLeaks’ Communications Decency Act immunity, they cite Dennis v.
>Sparks, 449 U.S. 24 (1980), which holds that federal judicial immunity does not protect
>a judge’s co-conspirator form a § 1983 claim. But Dennis involved a federal immunity
>from a federal law (§ 1983), while this case involves a federal immunity from
>state law (D.C. tort and conspiracy law). In Dennis, the Court had to reconcile the
>competing federal rules, but in this case, the Supremacy Clause means that the federal
>rule simply prevails. PLIVA v. Mensing, 564 U.S. 604, 621–23 (2011) (plurality).
>The federal immunity trumps D.C. conspiracy liability, foreclosing Plaintiffs’ claims.
GOOD POST!