Anonymous ID: 9e4d00 Dec. 29, 2017, 3:35 p.m. No.205656   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6065 >>6309

Local normies on the raid livestream were remarking it's a very rich area.

 

Looks like a typical townhome but worth mentioning.

 

Also this bread is blessed

>Pic related

Anonymous ID: 9e4d00 Dec. 29, 2017, 3:44 p.m. No.205714   🗄️.is 🔗kun

A quick search of homes for sale show townhomes in the Sterling area that are newer are approx 400-500k.

 

Poor by swamp standards I guess.

 

Trafficking safehouse? No proof just throwing that out.

 

Looks like the kind of spot rich swamp types buy their mistress. Comfy enough for them to visit and smash

Anonymous ID: 9e4d00 Dec. 29, 2017, 4:57 p.m. No.206202   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6207 >>6223 >>6227 >>6251 >>6255 >>6264

I want to revisit two things.

 

  1. The explanation for the DoD assange tweet is bullshit. The intelligence / topic search area of enterprise level social tools and the area for content publishing are ENTIRELY SEPARATE. In the past year I personally reviewed the top 4 social tools available at this level. There is no way you would search for a topic where you publish. There also is always workflow built in for approvals.

 

  1. Tweets and retweets can be prescheduled. I know people who schedule months in advance. Retweets are tricky because you can schedule a RT of something already posted, in the past. If it's a retweet of a recent tweet, someone is active on the account.

 

  1. At this level of politics there are multiple authorized users on accounts.

Anonymous ID: 9e4d00 Dec. 29, 2017, 5:06 p.m. No.206269   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6281

>>206251

You're right Anon, my bad. I had their account on the brain

 

Regardless there is not a single fucking way you would errantly tweet that and think it was a topic search within your monitoring/publishing tool.

 

NONE