So much concern it seems ; ) -

>>204184

There has been heavy effort to discourage looking at this account - even though Q’s last post directly references it. The content on the account is all well sourced and relevant. And tweets have been going from it today and seems to be intended to be (all tweets / retweets) something for normies. It surprises me how much this is being derailed even though Q plainly intended it to be used. Unless the content on the account is proven to be false, it is a very weak argument and suspect to push not going to it so hard. I need another coat. It’s so shilly brrrr

>>206538

Seriously ? His last post:

Dec 25 2017, 15:57:38

Q

!UW.yye1fxo

173382

10, [10-9]

Operational_window(5-6)_FDeltaC25-26

Secured.

Floor is yours.

Twitter FW_

Twitter [kill_rogue] <—- THIS = @kill_rogue twitter account

CONF_WHITE_WHITE_

Q

>>206575

Intended for >>206550

>>206583

Because that just can’t possibly be? I think anons can look at the twitter account themselves and make up their own minds with censoring anons

>>206597

“Without” censoring anons

>>206604

I never said he said it was Q. In fact, “the floor is yours” seems to infer he is stepping back so the holder of this account can do as they are now (could be JA who knows.) Q not posting seems to support this fact. It at least warrants some due diligence vs claims the topic should result in a ban FFS

>>206655

Yes. I think it may be intended for normies and plebbit should follow it and encourage followers it would be stupid for us anons to ignore it. The content is all legit. Every action on the account paints a clear picture that’s easy to follow. Probably needs a thread rollout for twatters to share (probably are doing so.) The next logical phase is to expand the audience further I suspect