Anonymous ID: aced55 Dec. 29, 2017, 7:25 p.m. No.207171   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>207129

Yeah, that’s what I thought. Did she work in HRCs office? There are a few with that name in it and they seem like she’s working for her

Anonymous ID: aced55 Dec. 29, 2017, 8:39 p.m. No.207693   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7707

>>207659

When you say code, I think stringers. The thing about what is being posted, is it’s being created by people that already know the whole picture so it may seem like a clear, easy clue, which isn’t always the case. Or they were trying to say we aren’t getting it because future proves pst, in a round about way since they keep saying it and we keep forgetting.

Anonymous ID: aced55 Dec. 29, 2017, 9:03 p.m. No.207860   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7884

>>207788

Exactly. If we can’t provide some type of evidentiary support, then it will only hirt the cause. You can’t just say, oh well an anonymous person posted it on this board one day. Unfortunately, until there’s something to back it up, we can’t use that information.