Anonymous ID: 26deda Dec. 30, 2017, 12:18 a.m. No.208823   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Sealed Indictments

 

Each indictment can name numerous defendants, esp if there are allegations of criminal conspiracy. So, take the number of reported indictments and multiply by x for the number of actual defendants. 20,000? 30,000? Gitmo can house 30,000. There were only a few dozen there last month.

Anonymous ID: 26deda Dec. 30, 2017, 12:42 a.m. No.208918   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>208665

Bush Jr. specifically authorized Mil Tribunals of enemy combatants at Gitmo, but it's been a real legal football. All kinds of unusual issues. If the trials go forth there as most anons think, the legal issues will multiply, however, the appeals will be determined by a 3 member panel of Officers, probably on site. SCOTUS may have final jurisdiction, but it doesnt mean they will hear any cases. They might. The legal issues alone on these trials will be legendary, not to mention the historical aspects of the sentences.

Anonymous ID: 26deda Dec. 30, 2017, 2:36 a.m. No.209205   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9250

If the Trump Admin does an illegal wiretap and for example, hears a bunch of Kabalists plotting to kill him, that evidence should be usable as evidence in a Mil Tribunal. No exclusionary rule for evidence in the Tribunal, it can consider all evidence no matter how obtained – torture, coercion etc are not gtpunds ot exlcude evidence as they are in District Courts.