The fact you even interpreted it as a code hinting at something more meaningful is enough.
As to who is doing the eating? Well, let me just say… some of you are tasty.
Great!
Exactly. We just need to keep digging and compiling information. But we desperately need organization. Our digging goes off in a million different and becomes its own tangled mess.
We should review the basics. Are we completely certain our initial estimates were correct? Do they continue to make sense after new Q posts? How do we determine whether a news item was, or was not, actually predicted by Q?
I've noticed a lot seems to get repeated without substantiation. It doesn't invite testing methodology. I think a lot of anons are using different methodologies to interpret the stringers, which creates a lot of 'incidental' correlations between them, but how much of this is just confirmation bias? I know these are questions most anons here have asked themselves, but they are worth discussing. Frankly, the more I examine Q's posts the more I sense there is a simple solution - a cipher as it were - which, when applied to the stringers, demonstrate a consistent pattern. There are greater events still to come…
tl;dr Q is a prophet