>>209598
seconded.
>inb4 famefags contributed because they wanted to get fame.
at least they contributed substantially.
>>209598
seconded.
>inb4 famefags contributed because they wanted to get fame.
at least they contributed substantially.
>he might have done so on 8chan
might have, sure;
probably didn't, though
>any shill/clown could have jumped in as a "baker" here as well (and poison/screw with the bread) ?
yes
and now you know why we were so keen on having a few trusted tripfags bake the threads.
but then the BO decided we didn't need tripcodes.
we are in a shillfest ever since.