dChan
Anonymous ID: 3f0aae Dec. 30, 2017, 5:47 a.m. No.209604   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9621

>>209486

>>209548

 

from your own sauce, doesn't trust the numbers.

But why would they lie? It's not like the Center for Responsive Politics is funded by Soros' Open Society or anything.

 

Oh, wait. They are.

Anonymous ID: 3f0aae Dec. 30, 2017, 6:03 a.m. No.209649   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>209640

Still saucing from Open Secrets, funded by Soros' Open Society. I don't want to ad hominem or anything, but there is def a chance of bias.

Anonymous ID: 3f0aae Dec. 30, 2017, 6:39 a.m. No.209760   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9772 >>9804 >>9823 >>9836 >>9895

>>209467

>>209486

>>209496

>>209543

>>209687

>>209710

>>209486

>>209490

>>209478

 

YOUR SAUCE IS BROKE.

4.5 MIL IS FOR SC's SANFORD

NOT GOWDY

 

Can we move on now?

 

www.whatnetworth. com

 

references

 

http://www.mcclatchydc. com/news/politics-government/congress/article51324980.html

 

"At the top of South Carolina’s list with a net worth of $4.5 million, Sanford is only the 127th richest member in the U.S. Congress."

 

"At the bottom of the South Carolina list is Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-Spartanburg, with an average net worth of $167,000."

 

Just ref'd relevant posts.

meme not directed at any anons.

just fake news.

Anonymous ID: 3f0aae Dec. 30, 2017, 6:48 a.m. No.209788   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>209772

did you read your source?

it references the McClatchy article.

 

The McClatchy article explicitly says the 4.5M is for Sanford, not Gowdy.

 

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/congress/article51324980.html

Anonymous ID: 3f0aae Dec. 30, 2017, 6:52 a.m. No.209804   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>209760

from http://www.whatnetworth. com/trey-gowdy/

 

"Estimated net worth has been taken from:

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/congress/article51324980.html"

 

Which says 4.5M is for Sanford, NOT Gowdy.

 

It's simple, really.

Anonymous ID: 3f0aae Dec. 30, 2017, 6:59 a.m. No.209825   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0299

>>209651

No, it's not. It was a "mistake." It reported Sanford's income as Gowdy's income. Two different people. It didn't even get the right info from its own source listed at the bottom of the article.