Missing Q posts on github

There IS a resolution.

Q's FIRST post on 8ch was

>>10956085

https://8ch.net/pol/res/10913010.html#10956085

11/25/17 (Sat) 22:54:45 ID: 48dd16

yes, correct healthy link b/c internal

SECOND post on 8ch was /cbts/

>>10956374

https://8ch.net/pol/res/10913010.html#10956374

11/26/17 (Sun) 00:28:38 ID: 48dd16

again, healthy link b/c it is here.

BO did choose to have this board included in the 8ch archive, (THANK YOU BO). It's clunky and not user-friendly like cuckchan but it's there and we have it.

What this means is that even if some of the Q posts have fallen off of the github site, github anon can use the links in the spreadsheet and fix it. ALL of Q's post from 4 & 8 are there, all have direct working links to his posts and they are all in chronological order (each new post starts with a light green line for easy visibility).

[I do back up the spreadsheet constantly and encourage others to do so as well. It's always good to have backups.]

So if anyone sees or knows how to get in touch with github anon, let him know he can do that please.

>>209455

OP, could you please include this post in the pastebin for the dough up top until we can get github anon's attention?

>>209818

This will also help those who keep asking about the issue.

Thank you.

>>209552

Clowns, infowarriuhz/hangers-on, shills, SB, tiny amount of actual anon trolls. You'll notice a pattern. The uptick signals their increasing panic.

>>209688

>>209690

>>209726

>>209727

Isn't it interesting who anons are being pushed really, really hard to suspect? Someone who the President trusts? Instead of those that Q directed us to look into? Lawmakers who have foundations, who were given big donations by Saudis to their foundation & campaign?

No, no no!

Anons should look into and suspect someone the POTUS trusts, don't bother looking into what Q said!

Reminds me an awful, awful lot of the "Thomas Drake was smuggling mini nukes on the flight to Japan" bullshit the "helpers" were pushing

Gee I just can't figure it out…

>>209980

The "helper" faggotry has been going on for days, and yeah the twatter account is a distraction.

What's most obvious and disappointing is that actual live anons aren't helping with what Q actually asked us to do:

>list those who have foundations

>track their income

>make the connections between donors to campaigns/foundations and known bad actors

Q was referencing SA

Someone was digging into Federika Wilson yesterday and that's fantastic, but I haven't seen other ones.

But then again, with the publicity yesterday, we should have expected an influx…

>>210079

> to me means stfu and watch…

You are certainly welcome to do that. Actual anons will pay attention to what Q asked and answer questions he asked, follow the people he has stated specifically.