Anonymous ID: a876a5 Dec. 30, 2017, 4:54 a.m. No.209467   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9478 >>9496 >>9533 >>9597 >>9722 >>9760 >>9809 >>9856 >>9915 >>0001 >>0062 >>0192 >>0258

Any anons seen the new twitter acct "PatriotLeaks"?

they're having massive hacking attacks right now, so have gone dark for the past 16 hrs.

 

Q had said to check out members of Congress' net worth (before/after) . . . and we've done that for many and we memed them โ€“ but, for the most part, they were the obvious suspects (Schumer, Pelosi, etc.). PatriotLeaks claims Trey Gowdy and Dana Rohrabacher are on the take and are traitors. Have we ever looked into them (I took a quick look at Gowdy and it seems he's skyrocketed from $175k to over $4mm in just a few years, but the sources were inconsistent. Also recently read that Gowdy just got the highest security clearance available . . .and he'd worn a purple tie to something . . . hmmmm???).

 

Any anons available to check into Trey and Dana's finances today? With Joy Villa recently being outted it made me wonder who else we've overlooked . . . when I saw the PatriotLeaks posts I thought, hmmm again, I have always wondered how Gowdy couldn't nail Hillary on Benghazi, etc. (all bark no bite, ALWAYS).

 

I'll post some screen shots from PL twitter . . .

 

Again, this is Q related!

Anonymous ID: a876a5 Dec. 30, 2017, 5:04 a.m. No.209486   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9513 >>9604 >>9760

>>209478

that's my thought, anon.

 

check this out:

Gowdy's net worth in 2014: $167,499

http: //members-of-congress.insidegov.com/l/523/Trey-Gowdy

 

in 2017:

4.5 million

http: //www.whatnetworth.com/trey-gowdy/

 

need to check more data though (i'm not sure about these sources) any ideas?

Anonymous ID: a876a5 Dec. 30, 2017, 5:14 a.m. No.209519   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>209495

WE NEED TO DIG. This could be huge, and it Gowdy is deepstate, it will remove one of their big players from the board.

also, Dana R. (PatriotLeaks had said to check out his "vacation home"/what's the "workshop" for??? (pic related)

Anonymous ID: a876a5 Dec. 30, 2017, 5:17 a.m. No.209526   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9531

>>209495

I'd always felt Jason Caffetz had been the guy to make We the People look like someone in Congress was trying to do their job, but now that he's gone . . . Trey Gowdy??? If true, many will find this very hard to believe. We need to research this, and if true, get the word out. Gowdy just got the highest clearance possible.

Anonymous ID: a876a5 Dec. 30, 2017, 5:25 a.m. No.209543   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9760

>>209505

And what exactly was the end result of the Benghazi Committee, headed up by Mr. $4.5 million Gowdy?

He's worth looking into, anon. Deep State has their guys in place at all levels. We've been fooled many times before. Let's look and then decide on Mr. Gowdy.

Anonymous ID: a876a5 Dec. 30, 2017, 5:38 a.m. No.209578   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9981

>>209533

hadn't seen that, thx.

so we have Gowdy trying to take the heat off Comey, Rino Ryan, and Mueller (the only one in my mind who may have been flipped by Trump). Let's just see where the $$$$ leads us re. Gowdy. His net worth sure has catapulted in the past 4 years. He gets nothing done. He's an excellent orator and certainly makes us feel he's on our side, fighting for Justice and all that . . . and then he's gone, until the next Committee hearing sound bite.

Worth looking into.

Anonymous ID: a876a5 Dec. 30, 2017, 5:57 a.m. No.209634   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9677

>>209623

who's the shill here? that article is over a week old. Also, go back and read the Benghazi headlines . . . and what became of those hearings? NOTHING.

He's worth taking a look into, unless you're trying to cover for him.

Anonymous ID: a876a5 Dec. 30, 2017, 6:04 a.m. No.209651   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9825

>>209635

what those sites reported are facts, anon. other sites may offer additional facts/opposing facts, etc. like a jury, we look at all the facts, assess what's more credible, what's worthy of consideration, and come to a conclusion. we're in that process, nothing has been decided, we are gathering facts, and those are facts. what facts have you come up with, or are you just here to complain and criticize?

Anonymous ID: a876a5 Dec. 30, 2017, 6:06 a.m. No.209661   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>209638

no problem w/ 2014 . . . it's the 3 year span to 2017 and the corresponding possible increase in net worth to over $4million.

Q said to look at the before and after net worths? Where did these members of Congress get all the money during their tenure?

Anonymous ID: a876a5 Dec. 30, 2017, 6:11 a.m. No.209682   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9694

>>209639

They're especially surprising HERE . . . our minds should be open, we should be aware of the Deep State's roots and treachery, and as you say, given what Congress has/has not done over the years, we should be scrutinizing every single one of them, unless Q has told us to TRUST that person, as he did Wray. Cognitive dissonance is alive and well, unfortunately. I hope Gowdy proves to be on our side, but if he's one of (((them))), I want to know. Simple as that. Shill factor here is remarkable.