THANK YOU FOR THIS BAKE. Shit is fucking odd rn

>>212038

Hey, regardless of what you think about lovefag, at least he gets baking done. we need it

>>212016

Can we get a running total of boots?

>>212051

If I remember correctly, last time I discussed it (days ago, I took a break) there was the idea that Soros replaced Vanderbilt. I can't recall the link precisely but it's an idea. You could look at the Soros surrogates involved in sex slavery and the Biltmore "pool" portrayed in pedo art, and try connecting the two families along bloodlines and abuse.

>>212083

No, it was the Clintons who lost power via the election, unless you're saying the Clintons are Rockefeller surrogates and I need to brush up on my connections

>>212085

I'm legitimately in the camp of Vanderbilt. Not disinfo. Given that you didn't reply to anyone you may likely be a shill but regardless I think we should put aside the disinfo-calling until we solidly nail the Soros-Family link down. We still haven't, and we obviously really, really need to. If you've got the right link it should be self evident.

>>212097

I'm answering to conjecture not spouting it.

>>212109

this, let the 4, 10, 20 talk die unless you're in a stringer thread

>>212123

Don't forget HRC's penance in the other direction. If anything I think their alternating flattery suggests that they're quasi-equal members of the owl cult

>>212144

It was more a general message after the "this," but alas

>>212149

With how much people are confusing the different links, I think you're right. We can't forget that even though there are four distinct families, they're all part of one web.

>>212158

What if the intern making the signal so that the media can run the story exposes the intern as a media/clown plant?

Lads, I've only just returned after some days off but my head doesn't feel right. I don't know what's wrong but I'm not in the same way I was. Everybody is arguing about the simplest links. I'm going to sit it out for a bit, see y'all soon