Right. The material has to be presented to the target audience in a way that will appeal to them. We can help re-frame the issues by using different verbiage to help bring liberals on board POTUS' programs. That's tricky but high IQ autists can do it.
Interesting.
>Then who would
There are people who stand to lose everything, not just their freedom is at stake. Intel from the entire world monitors here and cuckchan. There are a lot of fingers in the pie, a lot of factions and their many operators.
The question is: who would make a twitter account to sow distrust of the NSA whistleblower and patriot Thomas Drake, then retweet a lot of Wikileaks stuff, then change their name to something in a stringer that Q posted here?
Who does or would that benefit?
That's funny. I told you to fuck of to reddit twice :)
The language and culture of /pol/ is fine here, but it's not what will actually work with the public.
There are different age groups, different backgrounds, intellectual levels, experience levels etc here. There really is no "we" because anons even on /pol/ are radically different from each other in some ways.
The way /pol/acks talk/behave is board culture. There have many who have come in here and tried to tone-police us, which will never, ever work. Ever.
But board culture isn't going to help us in our effort to educate and calm the public.
Internal culture vs reaching an out-group, alien culture
More difficult for some than others.
A lot gets ignored, especially when da shillz r stormin'
>for those who want it
Like anons here and elsewhere and much of the public. Q has used the Socratic method as a psychological tool to draw anons in, and anons have projected that info/posts outward to do the same. Draw people in using basic human instincts and traits like curiosity. The information is there, most just don't know where to look, or when they find things, who to trust.