Anonymous ID: e7ee92 Dec. 31, 2017, 6:57 a.m. No.216182   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6190 >>6400

>>216163

This needs clarification.

The pope did NOT state he intends to change the Lords Prayer

He stated his belief that the wording could be better.

I believe he is a false pope, but this claim about him making an active attempt to change the prayer (specifically the English translation), is simply inaccurate.

FWIW it would take the council of American bishops to initiate such a change.

Anonymous ID: e7ee92 Dec. 31, 2017, 7:02 a.m. No.216198   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6255

>>216190

He was asked as part of an interview that examined the Lords Prayer line by line. A 7 part interview i believe.

The breitbart and other headlines were misleading and sensationalized. He commented that the French had already altered their version, because a more accurate word exists in French.

Again, he is not a good person, and a terrible pope. But a lose of critical thinking on our part does not help Q or this cause.

Anonymous ID: e7ee92 Dec. 31, 2017, 7:39 a.m. No.216300   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6328 >>6494

>>216255

On what precisely, sticking to the facts? Im guessing your not Catholic, or if you are, you are a C and E. The pope cannot change a biblical translation simply because he feels like it.

He is dangerous and a false pope, but pushing fan fiction from these boards to the masses that can be easily disproved helps no one.

The pope's suggestions to "clarify" the prayer are deeply troubling, but that is NOT the same as him announcing he is changing the prayer.

Anonymous ID: e7ee92 Dec. 31, 2017, 7:55 a.m. No.216362   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6393 >>6508

>>216328

This board has gone to shit. Qs post predicted a statement about the Lords Prayer. Idiots like yourself who did not read the transcript of the interview instead made assumptions based on media reports. You then carry your retarded conclusions to smarter people who easily refute your bastardized claims using evidence that is easily available.

Congratulations, you undermine the validity of Qs prediction to everyone you talk to about this by not having done an ounce of actual research on your own.

Anonymous ID: e7ee92 Dec. 31, 2017, 8:12 a.m. No.216429   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>216393

Thanks for the suggestion. Now here is one for you. Take your friends and fuck off back to reddit. There you can make all the retarded unsubstantiated claims you want. Some people on here are doing actual research on Qs posts, not just looking at headlines and pointing to them like simpletons.