>[Is] Spencer … (((controlled opp)))?
>I am yet to be remotely convinced by the simplistic evidence
WGAF? Whether or not he is "controlled opp" is irrelevant.
Nothing good can ever come from being associated with Spencer because he is an identitarian (Bolshevism 2.0).
1) He's a joke. Like a shinny new boy rock-star, he rises overnight by the corporate media to achieve international status as the new icon for white supremacy.
2) He is a spoiled rich boy who comes from an old money elite family and attended schools for the elite. Thus, at best, he can only pretend to represent those who live in "fly over country."
3) He openly admits to being a national socialist who aspires for a future global socialism, so long as the white breed is in charge.
4) He has shown only hostility and disdain toward the Liberty movement, whose principles and values are those of the founders.
5) But, most importantly, he, his beliefs and methods are inherently divisive.
Over 60% of Spencer’s own followers on his Twitter feed attacked him for being a deep state plant and a Soro's operative. In response, he said “Since 1955, American “conservatism” has been a roadblock to authentic White identity” and proceeded to attack all conservatives.
https://altrightexposedblog.wordpress. com/2017/10/24/richard-spencers-alt-right-and-the-alt-left-have-same-views/
Enough said…