I'm sure they taste like chicken.
Intriguing thoughts, Anon.
This is essentially how I predicted it to happen. Despite the bloodlust of some Patriots for justice, the goal is not spectacle, but permanently removing them from power. Bloodlust serves no one, and stirs an already unpleasant turd. I've trusted how this effort is going based on my own intuition and willingness to chase down corroborating facts, but I've been concerned at times that it would veer into uncontrolled chaos. That danger is still very much present, I know.
We don't need drama. We need economic prosperity, a respect for our civilization, and a justice system we can rely upon. Restoring those ideals will serve us far more than erecting guillotines and leering at pedos.
The religious side of this isn't nearly as important as the political corruption side, unless you have a scriptural dog in that fight. Regardless of your motivations for supporting the effort, the restoration of a secular republic is the goal.
NO. Do NOT take this approach. Not unless you want to discredit half of everything you say. Satanism only has high negative connotations to a minority in the US, who treat it as a spiritual force - like around 15-20%. Those folks are already on-board. You risk alienating more people by forcing an easily dismissable meme into their psyche. Focus on the corruption, not the baby-eating Satanic conspiracy. Otherwise, you risk what marketers call "the red face test".
That would be big. I'm assuming Mossad and SA Intelligence assets are being deployed. KSA is NOT happy with rockets being fired at their palaces. NOT COOL. The Russians appear to be backing away slowly. Removing Iran as a player would be huge, regionally.
This will all hinge on what the Republican Guard does. Or what is done to them.
I've done more research than you have. Which is why I know that it won't work. You're trying to initiate what's known as a Moral Panic operation, and the fact is we are already in the closing stages of one. Trying to piggyback another will make the entire narrative collapse in the minds of all but a small minority. Yeah, sure, dark corruption, sex slavery, organ harvesting, elite rituals, blah blah blah SATAN!
It doesn't sell in the suburbs. The only ones who will be moved by it are already believers. If you really want to incite popular opinion in one direction or another, you have to understand their inherent limitations in the context of the moment. Otherwise you risk irrelevancy.
It's a common term amongst memetions and marketers. It establishes the conceptual limits of the target's willingness to believe the narrative presented. Anything either "too good" or "too evil" to be true is withdrawn from serious consideration, at a minimum, treated with skepticism, or (the worst) abandoned altogether.
That's better than "EXPOSING THE SATANIC CONSPIRACY!". Most people pay attention to money and corruption. Depends on context, though. When you get into the moral issues, people are more apt to feel judged, themselves. When it's about money and power, people are more willing to take action. That's just human nature.
>even the green-haired mystery meat who never wants kids will NOT support child trafficking
This. If you want to get people behind you, forget the Satanic baby-eating. No one likes child trafficking, and the mere mention of it will arouse the passions of otherwise mild-mannered people. Keep your memage in that realm for best results.
Apropos to that, Q-tip: framing the immigration issue as a anti/pro human trafficking issue gets far more traction, viscerally. Contextualizing the Dreamers as innocent victims of human trafficking due to irresponsible parents and corruption gives you far more memetic leverage than being labeled as "anti-immigrant."
For example, if GEOTUS or Sanders (Bless Her Heart!) can quip something like "after the break the Administration will sit down with the pro-human trafficking lobby and negotiate a final status of the Dreamers in the context of a larger fix for our broken Immigration system."
Just a thought.