There are many movies with a seemingly prophetic narrative. The meaning Q implies by his name could imply this movie among many other things. In this case, I doubt Q is a criminal or that he's leveraging intel to benefit himself. The giant bird thing crashing into a pyramid and knocking the top off, however, that is clearly implied here. My assumption has been they imply themes/scenarios/roles similar to the people we're uncovering.
This is very interesting.
Following your method of associating fifths, you get these associations:
>Q, What is A Cooper's background?, Investor(s) in Fox News?, MSM, Social media platforms
>Speed, Who is A Cooper?, Controlling stakes in CNN?, and Why is SA relevant?
>Godfather III, Active?, Controlling stakes in CBS?, Top 10 Shareholders of Reddit?
>Snow White, What is Operation Mockingbird, Controlling stakes in ABC?, Top 10 shareholders of Twitter?
>Why is this relevant?, Why is this relevant?, Controlling stakes in NBC/MSNBC, Top 10 Shareholders of Facebook?
"Controlling stakes" here could be interpreted to mean the more ordinary sense of owning stock, but here I think it's meant more like the kind of stake you put in the heart of a vampire, and that control is leveraged over these organizations in a similar manner, i.e. by putting a stake in their heart.
This is my interpretation of the A Cooper association:
Somehow or another, Anderson Cooper is a "controlling stake" in CNN, and somehow SA is relevant. The movie Speed features a bus which is rigged to explode if its speed falls below 50 MPH. So somehow Cooper is being used to keep CNN "going fast," and if it slows down too much he'll cause the network to "blow up." Maybe this is done using blackmail on/by Cooper with the help of SA.
At the same time, Cooper's background is associated with (the movie) Q. Is this to imply Cooper is the criminal? Makes sense he might try to leverage his intel. Maybe the intel is something about SA which would irreversibly destroy CNN's reputation and/or the lives of its investors.
By the fifths association, "Why is this relevant?" gets repeated twice. Is this to make the proper spacing or is it to signal something more?