Anonymous ID: 5bdb82 Dec. 31, 2017, 8:34 p.m. No.220377   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0407

>>220350

I don't know why NYPD didn't leak and still hasn't. They hated Hillary and probably didn't want her elected. She never went into NYC which is why she was never arrested – presumably for 9/11 complicity, maybe for other crimes. But with the 9/11 15th anniversary remembrance ceremony, as a candidate she really couldn't miss it.

 

And so she was thrown into a van that looked like hers but wasn't and was driven away, never to be seen again for the remainder of the campaign. (For the rest, including the debates, it was another woman – younger, thinner, shorter.)

Anonymous ID: 5bdb82 Dec. 31, 2017, 8:39 p.m. No.220414   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0458

>>220387

I recall there was something leaked out around 2008 leading me to think the owners of the Fed are as expected, the major money-center banks. Goldman, Morgan Stanley, JP Morgan, Citi, etc.

 

These banks haven't been shown to be involved in human trafficking. They have a different cleaner gig and don't have to get hands dirty with that stuff as far as I know.

Anonymous ID: 5bdb82 Dec. 31, 2017, 8:43 p.m. No.220445   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0505

>>220407

It felt far from certain that Trump would win that night. It was a very strange night. If he had it all under control, well that's great.

 

If Trump had not won because NYPD didn't leak, that would have been unfortunate.

Anonymous ID: 5bdb82 Dec. 31, 2017, 8:50 p.m. No.220483   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0504

>>220458

Yes I know your idea, but I showed there's no link between the owners of the Fed and child trafficking.

 

As for the owners of the commercial banks that own the Fed? The owners of Goldman Sachs? Those are mostly former and current partners and other investor types who have nothing to do with child trafficking either. A few of these evil freaks probably own shares, but far from a controlling interest.

 

I don't see that this can topple any banks except maybe particular ones like some we've heard in connection with terrorist financing, none of them US banks.

Anonymous ID: 5bdb82 Dec. 31, 2017, 8:58 p.m. No.220521   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0548 >>0611

>>220488

He showed the existence under some reasonable conditions of the "Nash equilibrium", where each player's strategies are optimal given the other players' strategies in a noncooperative game.

 

That was actually a pretty simple proof but a clever idea to use a fixed-point theorem. He went on to do some really genius work in mathematics unrelated to game theory.

 

I don't personally see much connection between Q and game theory.

Anonymous ID: 5bdb82 Dec. 31, 2017, 9:22 p.m. No.220656   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>220523

I saw a bit of negative sentiment from Slovenia around the inauguration. After all she left. I think she's most useful as a goodwill ambassador. But all around the world, an accomplished man like Trump is respected.

Anonymous ID: 5bdb82 Dec. 31, 2017, 9:25 p.m. No.220674   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0702

>>220652

Well in fact the Fed is semi-independent. The Board of Governors is mostly government, but the Reserve Banks are privately owned, apparently by major commercial and investment banks.

 

So Trump is replacing the Chairman of the Board of Governors and can appoint a few governors to get more control there, but it's not like he has direct control over the Fed.

Anonymous ID: 5bdb82 Dec. 31, 2017, 9:57 p.m. No.220838   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0843

>>220824

Trump did say something like "Quick trial, death penalty." for the child abusers. It could be open-and-shut at this point esp. for a military tribunal.

 

Or not. Not at all sure of that, just that it isn't impossible at this point.

Anonymous ID: 5bdb82 Dec. 31, 2017, 10:18 p.m. No.220940   🗄️.is 🔗kun

off-topic: go step outside and look at the moon tonight. It's a "super moon" and is bigger than it will be again until 2034.