Checked and approved!
>Show me where Q said this?
ok, hold babby's hand
11/05/17
>>148139234
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/148136485/#q148139234
ID:L8quGPI9 Sun 05 Nov 2017 18:15:25
<line 994, question #791
>"Disinformation exists and is necessary.
>10 days.
>Darkness.
>War.
>Good v Evil.
>Roadmap of big picture is here.
>Review post happenings.
>Clarified.
>Crumbs not only for /pol/.
>The silent ones.
>Others monitoring (friends and enemies).
>Instructions.
>Snow White.
>Godfather III."
12/18/17
>>121559
https://8ch.net/cbts/res/120902.html#q121559
12/18/17 (Mon) 23:58:04 82d434
RESPONDING TO: >>121553
https://8ch.net/cbts/res/120902.html#q121553
12/18/17 (Mon) 23:57:15 d3b6f7
What happened on 12/7?
<line 3225 question #2383
>Clock started - 10 days.
That is an utterly retarded non-argument. Neither Wilcox nor Fulford are valid sources.
>muh ninja monkeys
Pull your head out of your ass.
This is not a game.
It's very disappointing the lack of reality, lack of discernment of what is real and what is not, who is trustworthy as a source or not, what the actual source says [read the Q posts goddamnit, what he actually said, not what you think you remember] and so will repeat spurious, clearly nonsensical bullshit. Newfags and naive youngfags swayed without actually CHECKING.
Lurch uuuuhhhhgggg
ohhh the muh-Area 51 is really a galactic embassy goys- er I mean guize "helper" helper glowfaggot is back.
Fuck off we're full.
Q said 7/10 plane crashes weren't accidents. I wonder what that Detective Superintendent knew, or the associations of any of the othersโฆ
10 DAYS.
DARKNESS.
That was the original poster's incorrect statement.
It helps if you go back and read it.
Multiple refutations
but you're fixated on mine, ok >>220302
And of course the post you responded toโฆ
It's because anons aren't paying attention, are getting confused, going off of memory, misreading, misinterpreting and glowfaggots can easily exploit that.
That is why we have records. That is why we are vigilant about the accuracy of those records.
>still doesn't get it
Show me the "10 days of darnkness"
That's what you asked.
There is NO
10 days
OF
Darnkness
That was the point.
That you missed.
>Exactly. People should use the Q search more often.
qcodefag.github.io/
Yes, that is the point.
You can choose to interpret but it's the misquoting that was the point. Q did say that accuracy of the graphic compilation of his posts -his words- was "critical."
Feel free to argue with him.
So why are you here?
I have also researched many of those things, but that's not the point.
The argument you made was
>person talked about Q, so Q doesn't exist?
That is just silly.
Both of those people tell truths and untruths. It would be like using Gordon Duff as a source. He tells truths and untruths.
Has anything you have seen or read here affected you, your perception of the world or view?