Anonymous ID: 9b620b Dec. 31, 2017, 8:32 p.m. No.220369   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0437 >>0624 >>0692

>>220312

>Show me where Q said this?

ok, hold babby's hand

 

11/05/17

>>148139234

archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/148136485/#q148139234

ID:L8quGPI9 Sun 05 Nov 2017 18:15:25

<line 994, question #791

>"Disinformation exists and is necessary.

>10 days.

>Darkness.

>War.

>Good v Evil.

>Roadmap of big picture is here.

>Review post happenings.

>Clarified.

>Crumbs not only for /pol/.

>The silent ones.

>Others monitoring (friends and enemies).

>Instructions.

>Snow White.

>Godfather III."

 

12/18/17

>>121559

https://8ch.net/cbts/res/120902.html#q121559

12/18/17 (Mon) 23:58:04 82d434

 

RESPONDING TO: >>121553

https://8ch.net/cbts/res/120902.html#q121553

12/18/17 (Mon) 23:57:15 d3b6f7

What happened on 12/7?

 

<line 3225 question #2383

>Clock started - 10 days.

 

>>220334

That is an utterly retarded non-argument. Neither Wilcox nor Fulford are valid sources.

>muh ninja monkeys

Pull your head out of your ass.

 

This is not a game.

 

>>220318

It's very disappointing the lack of reality, lack of discernment of what is real and what is not, who is trustworthy as a source or not, what the actual source says [read the Q posts goddamnit, what he actually said, not what you think you remember] and so will repeat spurious, clearly nonsensical bullshit. Newfags and naive youngfags swayed without actually CHECKING.

Lurch uuuuhhhhgggg

Anonymous ID: 9b620b Dec. 31, 2017, 8:56 p.m. No.220513   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0550 >>0731

>>220467

10 DAYS.

DARKNESS.

 

That was the original poster's incorrect statement.

>>220204

It helps if you go back and read it.

 

Multiple refutations

>>220306

but you're fixated on mine, ok >>220302

And of course the post you responded toโ€ฆ

 

>>220496

It's because anons aren't paying attention, are getting confused, going off of memory, misreading, misinterpreting and glowfaggots can easily exploit that.

That is why we have records. That is why we are vigilant about the accuracy of those records.

Anonymous ID: 9b620b Dec. 31, 2017, 9:45 p.m. No.220770   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0786

>>220731

>Exactly. People should use the Q search more often.

qcodefag.github.io/

Yes, that is the point.

 

>>220743

You can choose to interpret but it's the misquoting that was the point. Q did say that accuracy of the graphic compilation of his posts -his words- was "critical."

Feel free to argue with him.

Anonymous ID: 9b620b Dec. 31, 2017, 10:02 p.m. No.220861   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>220692

I have also researched many of those things, but that's not the point.

The argument you made was

>person talked about Q, so Q doesn't exist?

That is just silly.

Both of those people tell truths and untruths. It would be like using Gordon Duff as a source. He tells truths and untruths.