Anonymous ID: dcb567 Dec. 31, 2017, 11:11 p.m. No.221205   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1222 >>1225

What is the Socratic Method?

 

Were we told to question everything, follow the crumbs, build a map of connections by what is uncovered, and provide evidence?

 

Being pushed outside of that mission scope is a red flag, to me.

Attempting to get an emotional trigger response is another red flag.

Using faux debate tactics (appeal to authority, transference, false precepts, personal attacks, emotional triggers, etc etc) is a third red flag.

 

The only way to win the game is to not play. And this isn't a game.

 

We have to be smart.

We have to be savvy.

We have to use our wits and intellect.

 

Godspeed, anons.

Anonymous ID: dcb567 Jan. 1, 2018, 12:36 a.m. No.221551   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1633

>>221504

>โ€œAlthough there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case.โ€ - JC, on why HRC would not be indicted.

 

I always felt his choice of words were not telling the whole story; Frankly, I had read it as JC stating: "The agency I report to is compromised." at the time.