Is this the same woman who claimed that CIA compound in Langley had been breached by military??
I find it extremely difficult to believe that Q, knowing what is at stake, knowing about the 7 dwarfs would use a passcode that was not only a word, but no numbers or symbols.
I just can't buy that.
I understand that there have been others who used blank passwords at the Pentagon. But this is something altogether different.
I really just can't believe that Q would use something so weak.
Call me a cynical faggot, I don't care. But even I know better than that.
>.someone I know heard from his military friends
So that's 4 degrees of hearsay. I'm not calling you a liar, but do you see the problem here?
A rumor isn't proof. Someone saying it on youtube isn't proof.
Standards used to be a lot higher than hearsay and youtubers making unsupported claims.
No it doesn't make any sense.
Yes.
Unfortunately the github is not up to date. You can always check the spreadsheet, which is kept up to date. You can use the Filter function to find anything you are looking for, in any of the columns.
Correct.
The significance of Q using X-mas instead of Christmas is that there at least 3 people on Q's team, as we all saw (or you can look on the spreadsheet for the working links) the new tripcode tested out on the different devices.
Everyone and anyone can make assumptions like you are right now. Assumptions aren't facts.
The entire scenario requires both assumptions and skepticism.
>High security PW would be changed daily, if not more often.
That's not how tripcodes work.
So, instead of being cryptic and asking obvious questions, tell us where Assange and Soros are.
Of courser, there are a lot of holes. The "helpers" are sending anons on snipe hunting boondoggles, so anons are ignoring what questions were actually asked and inputting the DETAILS of those. I can only catch so many and put them in as we go. Plus spreadsheet isn't the best format for too many details it's already enormous.
If you'd be more specific on what in particular needs more details that would be helpful.
That sounds like an appealing target to me.
The spreadsheet's function is a central recepticle for what anons have found in digging for answers on Q's questions and statements. It's not meant to give to the public. As sections of posts are answered with high confidence, with context to later and earlier posts as well as news items, a summary is put in. The summaries, if someone wants it, can be made into a document, pdf or whatever format. So straight info vs prose.
There are pdfs of Q's posts but AFAIK they don't have answers, just the posts. Anons have also made databases to analyze the signatures and stringers and stuff. Data manipulation, not really to present to the public in those forms AFAIK.
Ok. Here we go.
Using X-mas instead of Christmas.
Trump highlighted using Christmas instead of the PC happy holidays.
Many Christians are overjoyed at this due to erosion of that aspect of culture by cultural marxism/pc
Fact that Q person used Xmas instead of Christmas can mean either:
>different person on the team was posting
>different person on the team communicates differently
>different person on the team needs us to accept that different style, was purposeful to see if we would notice
>same Q posted, was rushed, used short hand
>same Q posted, used Xmas personally, to call attention to Trumps use of Christmas
>same Q posted, downplaying religious aspect of the message (doubtful)
or, wild speculation:
Q's trip was already hacked
Well of course, anyone can read it, it's not secret and people all over the world (good and bad) do read it. What I was saying was that it's not constructed for or meant to just hand out as a red-pilling tool. It's not for everyone, most don't have the patience to read it through. >>223804
Does that make sense?>Spreadsheet good. Some "resources" designed to distract, confuse. Some just incomplete. Guidance needed.
>Spreadsheet good.
>Some "resources" designed to distract, confuse.
And that's why some are not used, no matter how much anons may like that person/personality.
>Some just incomplete.
A lot is incomplete.
>Guidance needed.
Yes, guidance is needed, and I'm asking for that specifically.
What matters is completing the task correctly. Quality output. Individuals are not important, egos not important. Completing the task, well, correctly and, on-time and under-budget would be good too.
Thank you but my autism can't process or grasp that - the lines, spaces and numbers & stringers I cannot process at all. It completely boggles me. I'm sorry.
But I will follow the previous suggestions.
Every single post on here (both /cbts/ and /pol/) have direct links on the spreadsheet, and will actually open, even if the general thread has fallen off the catalog. Just for future reference, that is always there. You can also export it and save it for yourself on your machine.
Yes, all of it. We have to analyze at more than one level (not just surface). Also the spreadsheet is searchable (filter) and my understanding is that some of the posts have "fallen off" of the github site. If anyone sees the github codefag, please let him know he can use the spreadsheet links to rebuilt/fix his site (which is invaluable IMO).
>Q wants us to sharpen our observations and be the autists.
:)
We also have to pay attention to the right things. There are wrong things thrown out to distract.
>I am waiting patiently for real autists to come back as well as people here to get up to speed. Light the fire again for newbies.
How can we do this?