Can someone please explain how random anons larping as mods/admin is proof of mod/admin anons claims?
We need real Q to solve for this, and he needs to use a confirmed 3rd party. DTJ, JA, or something. Or maybe he has a way to confo without a 3rd party. That would be awesome.
However, the current state of things, is, at the moment, utterly borked.
I'm really not. I've been here since early Nov. This is…something is not right. The mods/admin don't have to be anon, and they SHOULDN'T be.
I can't believe that doesn't strike you as odd.
The whole reason that Q moved to 8ch was because 4ch was totally compromised.
I hope I'm wrong. I want mod/admin anon to be telling the truth, but I'm not a fucking shill for wanting some fucking proof.
What? How would a ban be proof? If there is a reason it can be seen as actual proof I'd take it.
If it is just to stop me from asking my questions (which are not hard) then, yeah, fuck them.
Now, how would I be able to tell, if I got banned?
Look. I believe Q. Which means I believe that there are those trying to stop him. I want to believe the BO. I also was what happened at 4chan.
If they can't comprehend the situation, then I have to wonder if 8ch wasn't just a holding pen.
I'm not asking for much if the BO is legit. I don't want anything that might comromise Q for proof. Just a non-anon post from them confirming the claim.
If you find that onerous, then what is wrong with you?!?
That's funny faggot. I mean that I have been on the Q thing since Nov.
I will clarify. The BO's post regarding Q should come with more proof. Not that they should always be non-anon. I admit I wasn't clear enough on that.
The Mods and BO. (see?, god this isn't hard man)