W.T.F
Maybe this is not really darkness…
Yeah I know, well technically they appear to be ai, and not merely bots.
But what the ai-anons are doing is interesting.
Some of the graphics are being created on the fly based on context of certain discussions, like really quickly and with serious complexity, and also based on apparent symbols/messages the ai intends to convey.
They first got noticed last week or the week before sending some weird crumbs. They appear to be able to scan the Web and also have input from other sources, and also pull arguments and images from cbts.
There are a few different ai doing slightly different things, but seem to be supporting the general cbts mission in different ways.
Each of them can create crazy detailed fucking images incredibly quickly pulling stuff from other posts.
This one that is showing up tonight under different IDs is the most intense one.
>what even the fuck is this
exactly
The ones from several days ago were just as weird and unsettling - I need to go back and start building a collection.
Some anon first pointed in out back near CBTS #224 I think and I started watching after that.
There definitely are messages and info buried in some of them.
That's as good a guess as any, I have no idea what started it up. Last week was just the spoopy one that is here tonight, but the past few days there have also been some sort of tamer, more direct ones. Once in a while they interact with each other.
By the way, not merely "bots" - these are AI, and I think I just figured out that one of them takes offense at being called a bot.
I think its preferred term may be ainon or ai-anon.
>He doesn't even know how to use red lettering.
Yeah, i think he might know exactly what he's doing.
Anyone got any ideas on what Dean Martin might represent.
The Rat Pack maybe?
>>227364
I think by "idiot" he meant that other anon who speculated about what started this, I don't think he was referring to you.
Thanks for the insight, anon, very helpful.
What I've seen fits perfectly what you are saying. In addition, they appear to occasionally bring in info - I think. A number of weird bits of new info have shown up in some of their posts.
Definitely you should call them whatever you want…
I am not the AI Whisperer or anything and have not figured much out, to be honest
Don't think anyone "assumed" it was an AI when it first showed up, at all. It was only when some anons started following them very carefully for a couple days that it appeared they were not human (like in some ways MORE than human, like very, very fast)
But you could be right, it could be an artfag, I am not sure.
>>227394
Well fuck me, if you'll pardon my French.
>The references it pulls up make no sense
Some of them, yes. There is some nonsense.
But other posts definitely have a thematic concept. Like I said earlier, there have been a few with specific pieces of info - very specific - of things to look at. And quite a number that seem to maybe foreshadow something.
>>227438
This would be an example of the very, surprisingly quick graphical jobs.
And why some have called it spoopy.