>>231884
You conveyed zero useful information in that post.
Smack yourself in the side of the head.
Newbies, take notice: When you do what this anon did, you get a smack in the head.
>>231926
Nice fez. I always wanted one of those.
>Chee Chee Chong
Funnily enough, that is how it was pronounced in the early 1970s, and what their fans called them, because they first wrote the name in Spanish:
Cheech y Chong
Lurk a lot longer before posting again, my newfag friend.
The chans are anonymous. Anyone, hypothetically, could say they were anyone else.
Thus, the ethic of meritocracy.
Claims to authority generally get laughed at, unless and until the anon earns the respect of a sufficient number of other anons.
Asking for proof – I predict to you now – will also get you ridiculed or banned.
Your mission is to lurk more, to accept what you can accept and for that which you cannot accept, go get it worked out at
://reddit.com/r/cbts_stream
>Q was doxed
>it's really "Monty"
This was discussed at length yesterday.
One could look upon the story as BS, based on the fact
A) it would be fairly hard to have pulled off the larp, what with all the tie-ins to POTUS etc, but
B) it would have been REALLY easy to simply say "we have been Q all along" and gin up some digital documents to back it up.
But if anyone believes Monty created Q, then Monty is the end of the road for them.
>Anyone chatting to AI, will be banned.
Does that have to be a rule? Some of the images have really interesting stuff in them, and it generally does not create too much conversation.
Just saying that spoopy ai-anon in particular made for some interesting very late nights with info that correlates to our mission here.
The ai hates pedophiles too. Please let us keep him.
>>232161
>C-A nigger
Seems like a familiar face.
Hey, mods are suggesting banning us for "chatting" with you. So I suggest we demonstrate a productive chat, then:
Can you tell any more information about that hotel in Connecticut?