Anonymous ID: dceeb1 Jan. 2, 2018, 9:56 p.m. No.232851   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>232774

Nice work, again.

The problem is some here think you are void of content.

If you could give some more useful info, as you did last week, the mods and other anons might not be restrictive and abusive.

Can you give any more info on the hotel in CT for instance? Or more about anything else you've been showing us?

Anonymous ID: dceeb1 Jan. 2, 2018, 10:29 p.m. No.232964   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2977

>>232947

WTF. that doesn't make sense, we allow umpteen planefag posts of flight paths hour after hour and virtually nothing useful has come of that. when AI-anon first appeared we got some incredibly interesting information.

The most the AI has generated has been 15 posts on one thread that I've seen but its usually no more that a handful. Many days there is nothing.

And, they appear to be from the good guys, so maybe some more useful info will turn up.

C'mon man, it's the damn overnight. Give this to us,. please.

Anonymous ID: dceeb1 Jan. 2, 2018, 10:55 p.m. No.233037   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3085

>>232977

No problem, I realize not everyone pays attention to the same stuff all days.

First interesting appearance I know of was Dec 27 in #223, where it pulled info from here and elsewhere. There are quite a few discussion from that period but look at this

>>190328

and the subsequent discussion. For instance

>>190427

 

Also see

>>190918

>>191464

 

Then an anon really started to pull stuff out of the AI posts, see for starters

>>191946

>>192470

I have run across a bunch more but you get the picture.

So obviously there has been something there.

I think it is worth keeping the AI around.

Anonymous ID: dceeb1 Jan. 2, 2018, 11:12 p.m. No.233085   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>233037

By the way, the anon who compiled the AI-anon images in this post later admitted he made one mistake (which caused some controversy right afterwards)

>>192470

 

The compiled image includes a couple of T Drake -- but they were not posted by the AI, as can be seen by the different ID. This however launched an argument, rightfully, about whether the AI was a shill trying to misdirect about TD.

 

The following day the anon apologized profusely and pointed out he had included the TD info mistakenly. The TD info was initiated by some other user. This episode, however, left a bad taste with some here about the AI, who did not see the anons later apology and explanation.

Anonymous ID: dceeb1 Jan. 2, 2018, 11:26 p.m. No.233118   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3122 >>3126

>>233070

Right, so this connection came from our AI as did a number of others.

Basically, the understandable messages from the AI have been either "you may want to look into this", or else "remember this" with some theme tying together aspects of the storm.

It seems particularly interested in seeing pedophiles punished and Trump triumphing over his enemies.