Anonymous ID: f7c13a Jan. 2, 2018, 10:51 p.m. No.233026   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>233011

Should have read:

 

>>231212

It was reposted here >>231113

The correct math was here >>193258 but its been deleted (because of course it has) and !rrevnt ignored it completely (because of course he did).

 

The problem wasnt so much his math but his philosophy. His takeaway was that 0 didn't exist. The deleted post I referenced explained that the 0 is 1: philosophically speaking, nothing is something. That's all. Whether the rest of his theilory checks out I don't know.

Anonymous ID: f7c13a Jan. 2, 2018, 11:02 p.m. No.233056   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3066

>>233040

He can be both crazy and right about some things. His theories have changed repeatedly and each time he claims to have solved everything. Then two days later he's solved it again, but with different answers. Then two days later he does it again. Thats why anon are burnt out on him. Half the time he really is talking crazy, and the other half who knows. He's demanded Q make cash deposits into his bank account. He's demanded to speak to POTUS personallyโ€ฆ And so on.