>>233235

The wiser we become, the more we realize how much we don't know.

The one thing I have a contrary opinion on is the MANDATE for being a "team player." In certain situations - like being here on 8ch - it's absolutely necessary. But we're conditioned (Deep State conditioning) all our lives to believe that no other way has merit. Everything must be a team effort, introducing politics, jockeying for position, and abuse. A time and place for everything. Every major invention in history was created by an individual (with or without an assistant or two). The individual is the future. Covet individuality. Don't buy into having to apologize for that "inferior" approach.

>>233237

Tracy covets celebrityhood, always taking the approach that it's all about her; that people are far more into her than the Q material. As Spock would say, "most distasteful."

Has anybody figured out what happened to #272, etc.? It doesn't add up that it's bad guys making it go away. If they had that kind of access, they could and would do a lot more. Still … what would it take for the Clowns to intimidate, pay off, or both, one person @ the web site hosting company to get the account password? This is probably a minimum wage tech that would have to be coerced.

>>233806

WHAT would be the point? What benefit would be seen that could even begin to offset the cost?

>>233817

Is this Jeopardy? "I'll take Hillary Atrocities, Alex."

>>233831

[GASP] HE went to JARED!

>>233866

I was addressing this in a more general sense. It's thrown around everywhere you look, from advertising to schools: teamwork is superior to individuality. Like it's a blanket truth. This is because individuality must precede teamwork. Teams are great for sporting events, company environments, etc. But in the world today there is a severe shortage of individual goals. People are brainwashed into believing that the only way to get anything done is via a team.

BO: are we - even potentially - classifying >>233578 as "maybe" Q? Do you know more than you're telling? :)

>>233904

This was THE most idiotic posting I have ever made. It's an embarrassment for me. Through repeated idiot episodes I will learn: assume later, research NOW. As soon as I did a page-wide search on the ID, it became immediately obvious: not Q. If it's drilled into my noodle enough times, it may actually stick: assume nothing, go dig. There is hope despite any appearances to the contrary.

>>233927

Notable that ONLY MSM source are returned by Google. This HAS to affect their advertising revenue.

>>233917

Note that the recent "Matlock episode" with fake Q in here had nothing to do with cracking the password; that had long since been done.

>>233940

I just covered that. >>233929

>>233946

Since I was the one who accidentally spewed out "Matlock" a few days ago, when fake Q was already on, I pretty much do know.

>>233948

In that specific case.

>>233953

LOL point taken.

>>233956

That should have referenced >>233950, not >233953. I'm just a train wreck this morning.