>>233970

Nov 9 2017, 23:07:15

Q !ITPb.qbhqo

>>148779656

I can find only one post when Q said 'mirror'

Trip added.

[C]oordinated effort to misdirect.

Guide to reading the crumbs necessary to cont[I]nue.

Attached gr[A]phic is correct.

Linked graphics are incorrect and false. Graphic is necessary and vital.

Time stamp(s) and order [is] critical.

Re-review graphic (in full) each day post news release.

Learn to distinguish between relevant/non-relevant news.

Disinformation is real.

Disinformation is necessary.

Ex: US ML NG (1) False SA True

Why was this necessary?

What questions were asked re: SA prior to SA events?

Why is this relevant?

Think mirror.

Look there, or [here], or there, truth is behind you.

Just my opinion:

We have had no new Q post for a full 8 days

Some folks on board have tried to keep an eye on current happenings, like planefags.

This was helpful – I thank them.

BUT - Much of the board convo deteriorated….

Paid shills, and a variety of others successful drove away some genuine researchers.

IMO Much of the work on board has been stalled.

“Helper Anons’ came on to try to give guidance but they have become suspect.

Just my opinion, nothing too significant will happen on the board until Q returns.

Despite the efforts of numerous generous, hard-working folks…I think this is where we are.

With return of Q, we can

Re-group

Re-Establish cohesiveness

Clarify research focus

Resume red pilling public

>>234109

I wouldn't disagree with that statement.

But a mere fraction of what it was…

>>234188

Settle down, zealot.

I expressed an OPINION

You have yours, I have mine.

>>234143

Completely agree. Has been amazing. Degree of info, data mgmt/ organization is stellar.

Sad when we hit spells like we have been in for days…

infighting, stalled, circular, diluted, anon departure.

Q's return will re-establish momentum, IMO…

>>234274

affirmative

but good time to catch up on sleep

>>234479

300 "advisors"

https ://wikileaks.org/berats-box/emailid/33515