I doubt that, never heard of that. Can you show that in the Alabama law (or even another state you know better) or from a reputable source?
Given what Bannon is quoted as saying in the article, and some disturbing things I've seen come up on breitbart.com while Bannon's been running it after leaving the WH, I agree with Trump. Bannon is not a friend of the administration.
Bannon seems to be taking strategic shots against Trump. The comments about Don Jr. cannot be described any other way.
No it's not common sense, because once someone is sworn in he's not automatically removed even if fraud is shown. The law definitely allows prosecution before that.
What you're saying is wishful thinking. There's a huge schism among the R's that allowed Doug Jones into the Senate. He is now a senator and there's no prosecution in sight. I think his term runs out fairly soon though.
Well Bannon did say he wanted to turn government to chaos. Trump wants it to function but in his direction.
Big difference. Blowing the ship up vs. turning it around and restaffing it.
Trump has to destroy Bannon, because Bannon called Don Jr.'s meeting with the Russian woman "unpatriotic".
I do think Bannon lost his mind or is under some other direction (the Pope?), and that he will be destroyed and justly so.
Maybe Q was intended to create new places of discussion favorable to Trump, because his folks would need places to migrate to away from Breitbart – which is unreliable due to Bannon.
>>235451
Iran would be more a substantive topic.