>>234709

That's one tasty warm bread you have here baker, thank you.

When did the list of 300 drop?

>>234747

thanks

>>234746

what's remarkable with this list is that a lot of people who are in there are no longer relevant in politics

seems to indicate that an appointment in the committee is permanent

then again as I said on the other bread I am not entirely sold on this list, chances of bullshit are literally through the roof with stuff like that, and it's not like somebody with a bit of connections and knowledge couldn't make that up.

>>234754

It might be an outlandish claim here but there is also the possibility that Jones himself knows nothing about the fraud mechanisms. Protection of the figurehead, no lie under oath in case of an investigation.

>>234767

ofc but this type of material especially

with WL seal of approval it can distract quite significant resources from here and get anons side-tracked with shit for days

>>234781

He is not. Look more carefully.

Gotta leave it to you for now anons, the crumbs questions make sense, worth digging.

Not a single pro-Trump in there imo, at least declared.

God bless.