Anonymous ID: f747c5 Jan. 3, 2018, 9:08 a.m. No.234766   🗄️.is 🔗kun

just a thought: prosecution of any sealed indictments is more likely to take place in districts where new Judges have been confirmed to beat the past corruption seated. It might be helpful to track odd activity at those Courthouses.

Anonymous ID: f747c5 Jan. 3, 2018, 10:30 a.m. No.235048   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5060

Does anyone have a Pacer account to check if any of the sealed DC indictments have been assigned to any of these 3 new Judges?

  1. Timothy J. Kelly

  2. Trevor N. McFadden

  3. Dabney L. Friedrich

Anonymous ID: f747c5 Jan. 3, 2018, 10:35 a.m. No.235071   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>235060

Thanks anon! They are at the US District Court in D.C. These are the newest active Judges that POTUS nominated for that Court. I have a hunch these Judges will get the hottest cases

Anonymous ID: f747c5 Jan. 3, 2018, 11:30 a.m. No.235357   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5373

>>234792

The crimes, if any, have already occurred. The corrective action would be different before confirmation though. Once seated a Judge would remove him and replace him with Moore. Before seated, a new election would be held and the Governor would temporarily seat someone.

Anonymous ID: f747c5 Jan. 3, 2018, 11:47 a.m. No.235468   🗄️.is 🔗kun

for those wondering what could happen in Moore/ Jones if election fraud is found, here is an article. Note a 3 day civil trial took place and a trial would have to happen. http://www.nytimes.com/1994/02/19/us/vote-fraud-ruling-shifts-pennsylvania-senate.html