Listen, I think the dumbest part of the Q posts is the proving providence with posts/twitters close together. However, saying that there is no way a math professor from Washington has the means to pull that off.
Mega said that Q has been fake since 3 November. I don't dismiss that (possible), but the direction and the intelligence has been real and informative. It has also unleashed the power of people to focus on things.
Whoever Q is, I do feel they have an inside connection. Now, if the mass professor comes from the NSA and has a background in that or his friend is Drake and he was involved…ehh…maybe. I'm open minded.
However I haven't heard anything that makes one Q theory more plausible then a team of insiders from the NSA.
I would love to say my background, but thus I will remain an anon…