Does EO mean Executive Order?
Does it mean EYES ONLY?
Both?
Does EO mean Executive Order?
Does it mean EYES ONLY?
Both?
It can mean both
Good question.
Why do you think chans chosen?
There is a form of encryption here based on non-context free grammar.
Plausible Deniability.
We is some, not all
Further, how do you train an AI to go through CBTS and discern useful from non-useful?
Hard, no?
If you could train an AI to do that, it would have to be secret because there is classified information here that is above top-secret once deduction is used as part of the AI discernment protocol.
Win-win.
There is no AI here that I have evidence of.
This is better.
Plus meg said Discord is for famewhoring, money grabbing faggots, so there's that.
What is paraphrasing?
Given the use of Art of War tactics and a familiar pattern building across the world, first class strategy based on Game Theory is working.
It cannot and will not work for parties stuck in cognitive dissonance.
Cognitive dissonance is a killer for utilising game theory.
People drink their own Kool Aid. Eventually. So to speak!
The Bannon/Trump narrative strategy is ABSOLUTE GENIUS and has had me chuckling all night and during the interview with Tony Blair this morning on Radio 4.
Everything the side of the bad actors do right now is back firing and there is a reason for this.
Monty Python is what you are seeing now.
I LOVE this timeline.
Their biggest mistake was twofold at least.
Not only did they think she would win.
They absolutely thought Trump was JUST LIKE THEM!!!
[spoiler]
He and his family are NOTHING like them.
Love to anons
What you do is appreciated and we have great respect for you questioning anything and everything.
It is good that you are here.
The more quality critical thinkers the better.
BO is human after all and this is exciting for everyone because we have waited for so very long for any kind of decent saviour.
Eyes Only is a specific type of classified?
There were two parts.
Part One was an attempt to divide the UK populous by making the same, easily shot down, arguments to have a second referendum, which would game the hand in favour of the EU.
Part Two (the part people will remember the most)
Blair defended against claims in the same book out next week (Bannon/Trump) which states he gave Trump a heads up that the British Intel agencies were monitoring him on behalf of the US.
Blair was forced to say that everything about him was made up. Complete fiction.
Coincidence?
It was the Times that got hold of the Blair content from the book.
It was the Guardian that got hold of the Bannon/Trump content of the book (from New England book storeโฆ hint hint)
New England Patriots
Who does that exclude from seeing it that we don't want to see it?
Dem politicians?
Certain politicians?
Leakers?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eyes_only
My guess?
White Hat leak to Guardian to set the narrative for fake news.
Reinforced the narrative that will cripple fake news later.
White Hat leak to Times to re: Blair to destroy credibility of book, insulate Trump, make Blair have to talk about Times rebuttal and make Blair look like a bellend. I like the last bit.
Blair came across as a complete twat on Radio 4. It will massively glorious.
Not a single chance.
I say that with respect.
Blair is not only a war criminal, he is weak, he is on the list of 300 and he is a completely trouser soiled arsehole. Nobody would want the liability of him compared with the joyous plaudits of bringing a war criminal to trial and watching him do the dance at the end of a rope. Literally or figuratively, whichever floats your moral boat the most.
Weaponised autism is critical thinking on all the steroids.
Spergs gonna sperg, you just gotta point them at something good.
If I am understanding this, the immediate remedy would slow processors down as they would stop speculative processing?
Not as of this morning UK time as far as I am aware.
If that is still the case, what does it tell you?
Superman II
But it was a valid and good question to ask anon.
Gold
IMO multi-meanings.
Black hats are bad actors.
Drug and human abusing Hollywood actors are bad actors.
MSM liars are bad actors (their acting is bad).
People who operate fronts are bad actors (bad people and their acting is bad).
Bad actors are those also that are shit at acting.
In UML and many context free design environments, actors are those entities that perform actions. In this context, the bad ones are not good for the System.
Remove the bad actors in a System and generally the system improves.
Antifragile.
Can it be Pamela Anderson dressed as a nurse?
uk.businessinsider.com/intel-chip-bug-meltdown-and-spectre-explained-2018-1?r=US&IR=T
Ah, so you're in charge and exerting your authority.
Thank you wise leader.
Never seen you ONCE post anything useful with respect to Q messages.
ALWAYS behind the curve.
But thank you for your other service.
Whatever that is apart from being a bellend.